Dinsha Mistree
- Sociology and Political Science
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Daniel RoggerKim Sass MikkelsenKatherine BerschJan‐Hinrik Meyer‐SahlingLauren M. WeitzmanChristian SchusterFrancis FukuyamaNazli Choucri
- Topics
- Local Government Finance and Decentralization (3 papers)Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers)Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomBangladesh
In The Last Decade
Dinsha Mistree
16 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Sociology and Political Science 109
- Political Science and International Relations 72
- Economics and Econometrics 56
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 36
- General Health Professions 28
Countries citing papers authored by Dinsha Mistree
This map shows the geographic impact of Dinsha Mistree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dinsha Mistree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dinsha Mistree more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dinsha Mistree
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dinsha Mistree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dinsha Mistree. The network helps show where Dinsha Mistree may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dinsha Mistree
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dinsha Mistree. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dinsha Mistree based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dinsha Mistree. Dinsha Mistree is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | The Bribery Double Standard: Leveraging the Foreign-Domestic Divide | 0 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 99 | |
| 12 | 94 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Dinsha Mistree
Dinsha Mistree is a scholar working on Public Administration, Business and International Management and Management Information Systems, having authored 21 papers that have together received 284 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Local Government Finance and Decentralization (3 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (3 papers) and Complex Systems and Decision Making (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (25 citations), Development (22 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (36 citations). Dinsha Mistree has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Rogger, Kim Sass Mikkelsen, Katherine Bersch, Jan‐Hinrik Meyer‐Sahling, Lauren M. Weitzman, Christian Schuster, Francis Fukuyama, Nazli Choucri, Michael Siegel and J. Bradley Morrison. Their work appears in journals such as The Science of The Total Environment, Social Science & Medicine and Environmental Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.