Dino Christenson
- Political Science and International Relations top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Law top 0.2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- David GlickTaylor C. BoasJanet M. Box‐SteffensmeierDouglas L. KrinerCorwin D. SmidtMatthew P. HittHerbert F. WeisbergDean Lacy
- Topics
- Electoral Systems and Political Participation (27 papers)Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (11 papers)Judicial and Constitutional Studies (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaMexico
In The Last Decade
Dino Christenson
42 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 108
- Political Science and International Relations 473
- Sociology and Political Science 456
- Law 276
- Economics and Econometrics 258
- Strategy and Management 239
Countries citing papers authored by Dino Christenson
This map shows the geographic impact of Dino Christenson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dino Christenson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dino Christenson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dino Christenson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dino Christenson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dino Christenson. The network helps show where Dino Christenson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dino Christenson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dino Christenson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dino Christenson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dino Christenson. Dino Christenson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | Recruiting large online samples in the United States and India: Facebook, Mechanical Turk, and Qualtricsbreakdown → | 407 |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 26 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | Political Constraints on Unilateral Executive Action | 13 |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 20 |
About Dino Christenson
Dino Christenson is a scholar working on Communication, Political Science and International Relations and Law, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electoral Systems and Political Participation (27 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (11 papers) and Judicial and Constitutional Studies (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (276 citations), Political Science and International Relations (473 citations) and Communication (137 citations). Dino Christenson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include David Glick, Taylor C. Boas, Janet M. Box‐Steffensmeier, Douglas L. Kriner, Corwin D. Smidt, Matthew P. Hitt, Herbert F. Weisberg, Dean Lacy, Jillian L. Goldfarb and John Gerring. Their work appears in journals such as Energy Policy, American Political Science Review and American Journal of Political Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.