Dina Pilpel

892 total citations
15 papers, 713 citations indexed

About

Dina Pilpel is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Dina Pilpel has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 713 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Molecular Biology, 3 papers in General Health Professions and 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. Recurrent topics in Dina Pilpel's work include Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers). Dina Pilpel is often cited by papers focused on Sexual Differentiation and Disorders (3 papers), Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (3 papers) and Medical Malpractice and Liability Issues (2 papers). Dina Pilpel collaborates with scholars based in Israel. Dina Pilpel's co-authors include Jochanan Benbassat, Cynthia A. Carel, Zvi Zadik, E. Levi, Esther Leiberman, Ofra Anson, Asher Elhayany, Robert H. Brook, Orly Sarid and Gerald Fraser and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Medical Care and Journal of General Internal Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Dina Pilpel

15 papers receiving 680 citations

Peers

Dina Pilpel
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • General Health Professions 421
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 215
  • Pharmacy 85
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 78
  • Emergency Medical Services 65
Replace Alma M. Kuby with:
Alma M. Kuby United States
Confidence M. Gbarayor United States
Deborah L. Burnet United States
Jennifer Bennett United States
D C Morrell United Kingdom
Sue Pullon New Zealand
Sandral Hullett United States
John Tingle United Kingdom
R. Pill United Kingdom
Elisabeth Arborelius Sweden
Alma M. Kuby United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Dina Pilpel
Dina Pilpel · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Dina Pilpel
Dina Pilpel · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Pilpel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Pilpel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Pilpel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Pilpel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Pilpel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Pilpel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Pilpel. The network helps show where Dina Pilpel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dina Pilpel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dina Pilpel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dina Pilpel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dina Pilpel. Dina Pilpel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 15
2 4
3 7
4 38
5 32
6 50
7 440
8 14
9 20
10 3
11 35
12
Regional differences in appropriateness of cholecystectomy in a prepaid health insurance system.
16
13 35
14
Indications for Cholecystectomy
1
15 3

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026