Dina Baier

26 papers receiving 340 citations

Peers

Dina Baier
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 73
  • Biological Psychiatry 12
  • Oncology 104
  • Organic Chemistry 93
  • Toxicology 9
Replace G Niebch with:
G Niebch Germany
Eugene Malveaux United States
Jennifer L. Liras United States
Anthony H. Ingall United Kingdom
Fujiko Konno Japan
Marta Pérez Spain
D. Andrew Stevenson United States
Xavier Dezitter France
Gustaf Plym Forshell Sweden
Thomas Lauterbach Germany
Dina Baier relative to G Niebch Germany G Niebch's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.1×
G Niebch · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dina Baier

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dina Baier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dina Baier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dina Baier more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dina Baier

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dina Baier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dina Baier. The network helps show where Dina Baier may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dina Baier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dina Baier Line = papers co-authored together Dina Baier links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202052
2 200031
3 201926
4 202226
5 202025
6 201622
7 202020
8 202316
9 199416
10 202316
11 201815
12 199714
13 202113
14
[Guidelines for carrying out application studies in psychopharmacotherapy. "Phase IV Research" Study Group of the Society of Neuropsychopharmacology and Pharmacopsychiatry].
199413
15 19998
16 19998
17 20227
18 20217
19 20205
20 19975

About Dina Baier

Dina Baier is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Pharmacology, Psychiatry and Mental health, Oncology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 28 papers that have together received 358 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Treatment of Major Depression (6 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (4 papers), Sexual function and dysfunction studies (3 papers), Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism (2 papers), Tryptophan and brain disorders (2 papers), Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare (2 papers), Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis (2 papers) and Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (73 citations), Biological Psychiatry (12 citations), Oncology (104 citations), Organic Chemistry (93 citations) and Toxicology (9 citations). Dina Baier has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Walter Berger, Michael Philipp, Bernhard K. Keppler, R. Kohnen, Samuel M. Meier, Thomas Mohr, J. W. G. Tiller, Christine Pirker, Gunda Koellensperger and Alessio Terenzi. Their work appears in journals such as Pharmacopsychiatry, Pharmaceutics, Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Cancers and European Neuropsychopharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact