D. Andrew Stevenson

896 total citations
20 papers, 761 citations indexed

About

D. Andrew Stevenson is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, D. Andrew Stevenson has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 761 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Molecular Biology, 9 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 5 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in D. Andrew Stevenson's work include Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers). D. Andrew Stevenson is often cited by papers focused on Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications (8 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (5 papers) and Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (5 papers). D. Andrew Stevenson collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. D. Andrew Stevenson's co-authors include Hank F. Kung, Sanath K. Meegalla, Mei‐Ping Kung, A. R. Jones, Karl Plößl, Mei‐Ping Kung, Steven A. Kushner, Sumalee Chumpradit, Mu Mu and Dana Frederick and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American Chemical Society, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry and Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

In The Last Decade

D. Andrew Stevenson

20 papers receiving 720 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
D. Andrew Stevenson United States 15 363 214 154 131 85 20 761
H. Donald Burns United States 18 550 1.5× 420 2.0× 430 2.8× 124 0.9× 128 1.5× 42 1.3k
Jenifer A. Bray United States 15 273 0.8× 283 1.3× 76 0.5× 82 0.6× 18 0.2× 22 911
Brian G. Hockley United States 18 355 1.0× 156 0.7× 116 0.8× 70 0.5× 74 0.9× 39 796
Kumi Sato Japan 14 103 0.3× 205 1.0× 75 0.5× 54 0.4× 19 0.2× 39 930
Wenping Li United States 11 123 0.3× 246 1.1× 117 0.8× 88 0.7× 8 0.1× 44 796
Eugene Malveaux United States 19 299 0.8× 220 1.0× 182 1.2× 70 0.5× 54 0.6× 33 804
Terence G. Hamill United States 21 268 0.7× 616 2.9× 421 2.7× 54 0.4× 30 0.4× 50 1.4k
Takashi Uezono Japan 17 280 0.8× 257 1.2× 200 1.3× 164 1.3× 192 2.3× 25 916
R. Cantineau Belgium 15 296 0.8× 134 0.6× 114 0.7× 50 0.4× 12 0.1× 30 585
Chrysoula Vraka Austria 13 216 0.6× 154 0.7× 55 0.4× 85 0.6× 21 0.2× 60 560

Countries citing papers authored by D. Andrew Stevenson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of D. Andrew Stevenson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by D. Andrew Stevenson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites D. Andrew Stevenson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by D. Andrew Stevenson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by D. Andrew Stevenson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by D. Andrew Stevenson. The network helps show where D. Andrew Stevenson may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of D. Andrew Stevenson

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of D. Andrew Stevenson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of D. Andrew Stevenson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with D. Andrew Stevenson. D. Andrew Stevenson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Oya, Shunichi, Karl Plößl, Mei‐Ping Kung, D. Andrew Stevenson, & Hank F. Kung. (1998). Small and Neutral TcvO BAT, Bisaminoethanethiol (N2S2) Complexes for Developing New Brain Imaging Agents. Nuclear Medicine and Biology. 25(2). 135–140. 41 indexed citations
3.
Meegalla, Sanath K., Karl Plößl, Mei‐Ping Kung, et al.. (1998). Specificity of Diastereomers of [99mTc]TRODAT-1 as Dopamine Transporter Imaging Agents. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 41(4). 428–436. 54 indexed citations
4.
Kung, Mei‐Ping, D. Andrew Stevenson, Sanath K. Meegalla, et al.. (1997). [99mTc]TRODAT-1: A novel technetium-99m complex as a dopamine transporter imaging agent. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 24(4). 372–380. 130 indexed citations
5.
Meegalla, Sanath K., Karl Plößl, Mei‐Ping Kung, et al.. (1997). Synthesis and Characterization of Technetium-99m-Labeled Tropanes as Dopamine Transporter-Imaging Agents. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry. 40(1). 9–17. 129 indexed citations
6.
Kung, Mei‐Ping, D. Andrew Stevenson, Karl Plößl, et al.. (1997). [ 99m Tc]TRODAT-1: a novel technetium-99m complex as a dopamine transporter imaging agent. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging. 24(4). 372–380. 20 indexed citations
7.
Kung, Mei‐Ping, et al.. (1996). Characterization of a novel iodinated ligand, IPMPP, for human dopamine D4 receptors expressed in CHO cells. Life Sciences. 60(2). 91–100. 7 indexed citations
8.
Kung, Hank F., Dana Frederick, Hee Joung Kim, et al.. (1996). In vivo SPECT imaging of 5-HT1A receptors with [123I]p-MPPI in nonhuman primates. Synapse. 24(3). 273–281. 26 indexed citations
9.
Kung, Hank F., D. Andrew Stevenson, Zhi‐Ping Zhuang, et al.. (1996). Short Communication New 5-HT1A receptor antagonist: [3H]p-MPPF. Synapse. 23(4). 344–346. 50 indexed citations
10.
Meegalla, Sanath K., Karl Plößl, Mei‐Ping Kung, et al.. (1996). Tc-99m-Labeled Tropanes as Dopamine Transporter Imaging Agents. Bioconjugate Chemistry. 7(4). 421–429. 50 indexed citations
11.
Kung, Hank F., Dana Frederick, William McElgin, et al.. (1996). In vivo SPECT imaging of 5‐HT1A receptors with [123I] p‐MPPI in nonhuman primates. Synapse. 24(3). 273–281. 1 indexed citations
12.
Meegalla, Sanath K., Karl Plöessl, Mei‐Ping Kung, et al.. (1995). First Example of a 99mTc Complex as a Dopamine Transporter Imaging Agent. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 117(44). 11037–11038. 78 indexed citations
13.
14.
Stevenson, D. Andrew & A. R. Jones. (1984). The action of (R)‐ and (S)‐α‐chlorohydrin and their metabolites on the metabolism of boar sperm. International Journal of Andrology. 7(1). 79–86. 15 indexed citations
15.
Franklin, Richard A., Paula J. Robson, & D. Andrew Stevenson. (1983). Studies on the metabolism of the new anti-hypertensive agent, indoramin, in man. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 24(5). 629–634. 10 indexed citations
16.
Jones, A. R. & D. Andrew Stevenson. (1983). Formation of the active antifertility metabolite of (S)-α-chlorohydrin in boar sperm. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 39(7). 784–785. 18 indexed citations
17.
Stevenson, D. Andrew, et al.. (1982). Inhibition of Fructolysis in Boar Spermatozoa by the Male Antifertility Agent (S)-a-Chlorohydrin. Australian Journal of Biological Sciences. 35(6). 595–606. 27 indexed citations
18.
Jones, A. R., et al.. (1981). The fate of oxalic acid in the Wistar rat. Xenobiotica. 11(6). 385–390. 25 indexed citations
19.
Jones, Alice R., et al.. (1981). The renal toxicity of some halogenated derivatives of propane in the rat. Die Naturwissenschaften. 68(2). 98–99. 8 indexed citations
20.
Jones, Andrew R., et al.. (1981). The antifertility action of α-chlorohydrin: metabolism by rat and boar sperm. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 37(4). 340–341. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026