Dieter Schellong

661 total citations
6 papers, 179 citations indexed

About

Dieter Schellong is a scholar working on Philosophy, Classics and Literature and Literary Theory. According to data from OpenAlex, Dieter Schellong has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 179 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Philosophy, 1 paper in Classics and 1 paper in Literature and Literary Theory. Recurrent topics in Dieter Schellong's work include Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper). Dieter Schellong is often cited by papers focused on Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, and Hegel (2 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1 paper) and Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (1 paper). Dieter Schellong collaborates with scholars based in . Dieter Schellong's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as Nietzsche Studien and Evangelische Theologie.

In The Last Decade

Dieter Schellong

4 papers receiving 46 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Dieter Schellong	3	44	25	22	21	19	6	179
Wolfgang Röd Austria	5	40 0.9×	25 1.0×	23 1.0×	21 1.0×	24 1.3×	24	170
Ferdinand Fellmann Germany	5	41 0.9×	27 1.1×	22 1.0×	21 1.0×	5 0.3×	30	179
Román Gubern Garriga-Nogués Spain	9	20 0.5×	54 2.2×	6 0.3×	8 0.4×	42 2.2×	51	215
D. W. Krummel United States	8	8 0.2×	22 0.9×	9 0.4×	14 0.7×	6 0.3×	52	206
David Robey United Kingdom	5	10 0.2×	35 1.4×	5 0.2×	11 0.5×	17 0.9×	26	152
Gail Marshall United Kingdom	5	122 2.8×	24 1.0×	6 0.3×	54 2.6×	8 0.4×	26	206
M. Stubbs United Kingdom	5	17 0.4×	19 0.8×	8 0.4×	5 0.2×	23 1.2×	9	222
Andrew N. Weintraub United States	8	21 0.5×	129 5.2×	9 0.4×	5 0.2×	13 0.7×	29	203
Hedley Beare Australia	5	134 3.0×	19 0.8×	2 0.1×	11 0.5×	8 0.4×	11	169
William Pratt	5	13 0.3×	45 1.8×	4 0.2×	4 0.2×	14 0.7×	16	117

Countries citing papers authored by Dieter Schellong

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dieter Schellong's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dieter Schellong with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dieter Schellong more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dieter Schellong

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dieter Schellong. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dieter Schellong. The network helps show where Dieter Schellong may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Schellong, Dieter. (1995). "Nietzsche und Wagner. Stationen einer epochalen Begegnung". 2(JG). 4 indexed citations

2.

Schellong, Dieter. (1989). EINIGE INTERPRETATIONSFRAGEN ZU NIETZSCHES VERURTEILUNG DES CHRISTENTUMS. Nietzsche Studien. 18(1). 1 indexed citations

3.

Schellong, Dieter. (1984). „... UND IM KLEINSTEN LUXURIRT.“ ZUR BEDEUTUNG VON NIETZSCHES DIAGNOSE DER DÉCADENCE IN DER MUSIKPRAXIS. Nietzsche Studien. 13(1).

4.

Schellong, Dieter. (1978). Hermeneutik und Kritik. Evangelische Theologie. 38(jg). 213–226. 168 indexed citations

5.

Schellong, Dieter. (1970). Lessings Frage an die Theologie. Evangelische Theologie. 30(8). 418–432. 2 indexed citations

6.

Schellong, Dieter. (1969). Calvins auslegung der synoptischen Evangelien. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact