Dieter Doczkal
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecological Modeling top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Axel HausmannJérôme MorinièreStefan SchmidtGerhard HaszprunarLars HendrichThomas PapeMichael BalkePaul D. N. Hebert
- Topics
- Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (6 papers)Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (6 papers)Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Dieter Doczkal
14 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 199
- Ecology 198
- Insect Science 130
- Ecological Modeling 105
- Molecular Biology 90
Countries citing papers authored by Dieter Doczkal
This map shows the geographic impact of Dieter Doczkal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dieter Doczkal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dieter Doczkal more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dieter Doczkal
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dieter Doczkal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dieter Doczkal. The network helps show where Dieter Doczkal may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dieter Doczkal
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dieter Doczkal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dieter Doczkal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dieter Doczkal. Dieter Doczkal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 29 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 44 | |
| 6 | 75 | |
| 7 | 95 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | Rote Liste der Grabwespen Baden- Württembergs (Hymenoptera, Sphecidae) | 1 |
| 13 | Drei neue Arten der Gattung Epistrophe lDipterac Syrphidaerc mit einem Bestimmungsschlüssel fur die deutschen Arten | 4 |
| 14 | Ergänzungen zur Wildbienenfauna Baden-Württembergs (Hymenoptera: Apoidea) | 1 |
About Dieter Doczkal
Dieter Doczkal is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Insect Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 14 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diptera species taxonomy and behavior (6 papers), Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies (6 papers) and Species Distribution and Climate Change (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (105 citations), Insect Science (130 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (199 citations). Dieter Doczkal has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Canada and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Axel Hausmann, Jérôme Morinière, Stefan Schmidt, Gerhard Haszprunar, Lars Hendrich, Thomas Pape, Michael Balke, Paul D. N. Hebert, Samuel Arvidsson and Bruno Cancian de Araújo. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Molecular Ecology Resources.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.