Dieter Birk
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- H. G. Beger (2 shared papers)A. Formentini (7 shared papers)Johannes Jeekel (1 shared paper)M. H. Schoenberg (2 shared papers)Markus W. Büchler (1 shared paper)Helmut Frieß (1 shared paper)Sheila Payne (1 shared paper)R. Laugier (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Dieter Birk
34 papers receiving 717 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Oncology 250
- Surgery 320
- Clinical Biochemistry 28
- Gastroenterology 16
- Cancer Research 36
Countries citing papers authored by Dieter Birk
This map shows the geographic impact of Dieter Birk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dieter Birk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dieter Birk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Dieter Birk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dieter Birk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dieter Birk. The network helps show where Dieter Birk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Dieter Birk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 35 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1999 | 196 | |
| 2 | 1995 | 120 | |
| 3 | Ki-67 immunostaining in pancreatic cancer and chronic active pancreatitis: does in vivo FDG uptake correlate with proliferative activity? | 2001 | 80 |
| 4 | 1995 | 68 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 49 | |
| 6 | 1999 | 23 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 21 | |
| 8 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2000 | 16 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2015 | 12 | |
| 12 | 1994 | 12 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 12 | |
| 14 | Self-gripping Parietene and Parietex Progrip mesh laparoscopic hernia repair: have we found the ideal implant? | 2012 | 11 |
| 15 | Levels of serum neopterin are increased in pancreatic cancer patients and correlate with the prognosis. | 1999 | 11 |
| 16 | 2008 | 10 | |
| 17 | Robotic Camera Assistance and Its Benefit in 1033 Traditional Laparoscopic Procedures: Prospective Clinical Trial Using a Joystick-guided Camera Holder. | 2014 | 10 |
| 18 | 2014 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1997 | 7 | |
| 20 | 1998 | 5 |
About Dieter Birk
Dieter Birk is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Gastroenterology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 35 papers that have together received 739 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (10 papers), Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (5 papers), Hernia repair and management (4 papers), Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment (3 papers), Taxation and Legal Issues (2 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), Gastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment (2 papers) and Corporate Taxation and Avoidance (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (250 citations), Surgery (320 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (28 citations), Gastroenterology (16 citations) and Cancer Research (36 citations). Dieter Birk has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Austria and Greece. Frequent co-authors include H. G. Beger, A. Formentini, H. G. Beger, Johannes Jeekel, M. H. Schoenberg, Markus W. Büchler, Helmut Frieß, Sheila Payne, R. Laugier and A.A. Sandberg. Their work appears in journals such as Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery, Obesity Surgery, British journal of surgery, American Journal of Clinical Nutrition and Digestive Surgery.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.