Diego Scalise

455 total citations
9 papers, 302 citations indexed

About

Diego Scalise is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Diego Scalise has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 302 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Strategy and Management and 3 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Diego Scalise's work include Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers), Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues (3 papers) and Social Capital and Networks (3 papers). Diego Scalise is often cited by papers focused on Culture, Economy, and Development Studies (3 papers), Italy: Economic History and Contemporary Issues (3 papers) and Social Capital and Networks (3 papers). Diego Scalise collaborates with scholars based in Italy and United States. Diego Scalise's co-authors include Davide Fantino, Alessandra Mori, Paolo Sestito, Guido de Blasio, Paola Giuliano, Paolo Pin, Marco Arnone, Alberto Dalmazzo and Guerino Ardizzi and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy and Review of Social Economy.

In The Last Decade

Diego Scalise

8 papers receiving 299 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Diego Scalise Italy	5	254	107	96	38	34	9	302
Emanuela Ciapanna Italy	7	355 1.4×	130 1.2×	141 1.5×	25 0.7×	42 1.2×	17	415
Silvia Giacomelli Italy	9	280 1.1×	78 0.7×	65 0.7×	33 0.9×	76 2.2×	20	347
Davide Romelli Ireland	11	145 0.6×	170 1.6×	106 1.1×	35 0.9×	55 1.6×	39	310
Giorgio Nuzzo Italy	6	373 1.5×	102 1.0×	100 1.0×	61 1.6×	48 1.4×	15	433
Gaetano Alfredo Minerva Italy	8	315 1.2×	98 0.9×	150 1.6×	40 1.1×	55 1.6×	15	389
Sam Hak Kan Tang Australia	10	244 1.0×	154 1.4×	95 1.0×	40 1.1×	54 1.6×	27	344
Silvia Del Prete Italy	10	325 1.3×	197 1.8×	163 1.7×	36 0.9×	106 3.1×	31	454
Temitope W. Oshikoya Ivory Coast	8	211 0.8×	47 0.4×	105 1.1×	20 0.5×	41 1.2×	14	300
Angelo Baglioni Italy	12	212 0.8×	162 1.5×	88 0.9×	17 0.4×	116 3.4×	43	372
Vincenzo Cuciniello Italy	6	439 1.7×	199 1.9×	192 2.0×	32 0.8×	47 1.4×	17	503

Countries citing papers authored by Diego Scalise

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diego Scalise's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diego Scalise with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diego Scalise more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diego Scalise

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diego Scalise. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diego Scalise. The network helps show where Diego Scalise may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diego Scalise

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diego Scalise. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diego Scalise based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diego Scalise. Diego Scalise is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Scalise, Diego, et al.. (2023). Climate Change and Winter Tourism: Evidence from Italy. SSRN Electronic Journal. 4 indexed citations

2.

Ardizzi, Guerino, et al.. (2021). Interchange Fees and Card Payments: A Cross-country Analysis. SSRN Electronic Journal.

3.

Blasio, Guido de, Diego Scalise, & Paolo Sestito. (2019). Universalism vs. particularism: a round trip from sociology to economics. Review of Social Economy. 79(2). 286–309. 6 indexed citations

4.

Blasio, Guido de, Diego Scalise, & Paolo Sestito. (2014). Universalism vs. Particularism: A Round Trip from Sociology to Economics. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations

5.

Fantino, Davide, Alessandra Mori, & Diego Scalise. (2014). Collaboration Between Firms and Universities in Italy: The Role of a Firm’s Proximity to Top-Rated Departments. Italian Economic Journal. 1(2). 219–251. 177 indexed citations

6.

Dalmazzo, Alberto, Paolo Pin, & Diego Scalise. (2014). Communities and social inefficiency with heterogeneous groups. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. 48. 410–427. 2 indexed citations

7.

Fantino, Davide, Alessandra Mori, & Diego Scalise. (2012). Collaboration between Firms and Universities in Italy: The Role of a Firm's Proximity to Top-Rated Departments. SSRN Electronic Journal. 92 indexed citations

8.

Giuliano, Paola & Diego Scalise. (2009). The Political Economy of Agricultural Market Reforms in Developing Countries. The B E Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy. 9(1). 8 indexed citations

9.

Arnone, Marco & Diego Scalise. (2003). Macroeconomic Eects of Deregulation in Goods Market with Heterogeneous Firms. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact