Didier de Cannière
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Surgery top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Biomedical Engineering
- Co-authors
- Philippe UngerJean-Luc JansensUsha Seshadri‐KreadenSerge BrimioulleEric StoupelRobert NaeijeMarco MaggioriniQuentin de Hemptinne
- Topics
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (15 papers)Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (10 papers)Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- BelgiumUnited StatesItaly
In The Last Decade
Didier de Cannière
37 papers receiving 761 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 634
- Surgery 488
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 228
- Epidemiology 187
- Biomedical Engineering 50
Countries citing papers authored by Didier de Cannière
This map shows the geographic impact of Didier de Cannière's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Didier de Cannière with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Didier de Cannière more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Didier de Cannière
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Didier de Cannière. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Didier de Cannière. The network helps show where Didier de Cannière may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Didier de Cannière
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Didier de Cannière. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Didier de Cannière based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Didier de Cannière. Didier de Cannière is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 76 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 95 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | 25 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 46 | |
| 16 | 63 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Didier de Cannière
Didier de Cannière is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 38 papers that have together received 796 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (15 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (10 papers) and Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (634 citations), Surgery (488 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (228 citations). Didier de Cannière has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, United States and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Philippe Unger, Jean-Luc Jansens, Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden, Serge Brimioulle, Eric Stoupel, Robert Naeije, Marco Maggiorini, Quentin de Hemptinne, Volkmar Falk and Vassilios Gulielmos. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Applied Physiology and The American Journal of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.