Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden

1.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
15 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden is a scholar working on Surgery, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 6 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden's work include Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (6 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (5 papers). Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden is often cited by papers focused on Uterine Myomas and Treatments (6 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (6 papers) and Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (5 papers). Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Germany. Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden's co-authors include Maria C. Bell, John P. Lenihan, Ashutosh Tewari, Peter Wiklund, Prasanna Sooriakumaran, April Slee, D. Blöch, Sharon Hunt, Helen B. Hubert and Didier de Cannière and has published in prestigious journals such as Circulation, Journal of Clinical Oncology and SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.

In The Last Decade

Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden

14 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy

2012 361 citations Ashutosh Tewari, Prasanna Sooriakumaran et al. European Urology profile →

Peers

Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden

SURGE

OG

PRM

CCM

RM

W. F. A. Miles United Kingdom

Ingolf Tuerk United States

Hua‐yin Yu United States

Michael Sohn Germany

C. Alméras France

Matteo Bonatti Italy

Álvaro García‐Granero Spain

Dorit E. Zilberman Israel

Paul M. Verheijen Netherlands

Ruben De Groote Belgium

W. F. A. Miles United Kingdom

Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden

750 ×1.1

SURGE

102 ×0.2

OG

247 ×0.6

PRM

397 ×1.7

CCM

121 ×0.5

RM

Citations per year, relative to Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden (= 1×) peers W. F. A. Miles

Countries citing papers authored by Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden. The network helps show where Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden. Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Ricciardi, Rocco, Usha Seshadri‐Kreaden, Douglas M. Dahl, et al.. (2024). The COMPARE Study: Comparing Perioperative Outcomes of Oncologic Minimally Invasive Laparoscopic, da Vinci Robotic, and Open Procedures. Annals of Surgery. 281(5). 748–763. 8 indexed citations

2.

Luciano, Anthony A., et al.. (2015). The impact of robotics on the mode of benign hysterectomy and clinical outcomes. International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery. 12(1). 114–124. 21 indexed citations

3.

Pitter, Michael C., et al.. (2015). Fertility and Symptom Relief following Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Myomectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology International. 2015. 1–9. 31 indexed citations

4.

Pitter, Michael C., et al.. (2014). The Impact of Different Surgical Modalities for Hysterectomy on Satisfaction and Patient Reported Outcomes. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(3). e11–e11. 44 indexed citations

5.

Tewari, Ashutosh, Prasanna Sooriakumaran, D. Blöch, et al.. (2012). Positive Surgical Margin and Perioperative Complication Rates of Primary Surgical Treatments for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Retropubic, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Prostatectomy. European Urology. 62(1). 1–15. 361 indexed citations breakdown →

6.

Bell, Maria C., et al.. (2011). Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches.. PubMed. 64(6). 197–9, 201, 203 passim. 39 indexed citations

7.

Sooriakumaran, Prasanna, et al.. (2011). A meta-analysis comparing positive surgical margin and complication rates of 110,016 patients undergoing open retropubic, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.. Journal of Clinical Oncology. 29(7_suppl). 103–103.

8.

Bell, Maria C., et al.. (2008). Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecologic Oncology. 111(3). 407–411. 287 indexed citations

9.

Lenihan, John P., et al.. (2008). What is the Learning Curve for Robotic Assisted Gynecologic Surgery?. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 15(5). 589–594. 187 indexed citations

10.

Srivastava, Sudhir, et al.. (2008). Robotically Assisted Beating Heart Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass (TECAB). is There a Future?. Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 3(2). 52–58. 3 indexed citations

11.

Srivastava, Sudhir, et al.. (2008). Robotically Assisted Beating Heart Totally Endoscopic Coronary Artery Bypass (TECAB). is There a Future?. Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 3(2). 52–58. 25 indexed citations

12.

Cannière, Didier de, Gerhard Wimmer‐Greinecker, Romuald Cichoń, et al.. (2007). Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting: Multicenter European experience. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 134(3). 710–716. 95 indexed citations

13.

Murphy, Douglas, J. Michael Smith, Leland Siwek, et al.. (2007). Multicenter Mitral Valve Study: A Lateral Approach Using the da Vinci Surgical System. Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 2(2). 56–61. 4 indexed citations

14.

Murphy, Douglas, J. Michael Smith, Leland Siwek, et al.. (2007). Multicenter Mitral Valve Study: A Lateral Approach Using the da Vinci Surgical System. Innovations Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery. 2(2). 56–61. 10 indexed citations

15.

Katz, Marc, Didier de Cannière, Douglas Murphy, et al.. (2006). Integrated Coronary Revascularization. Circulation. 114(1_supplement). I473–6. 66 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact