Diane Horowitz
Impact in
- Nephrology top 10%
- Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
- Neurology top 10%
- Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
Papers in
-
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research 2
- Co-authors
- Maria-Louise Barilla-LaBarca (1 shared paper)Scott Horowitz (1 shared paper)Richard Furie (2 shared papers)Galina Marder (1 shared paper)Nina Kello (1 shared paper)Yaakov A. Levine (2 shared papers)Emmett V. Glass (1 shared paper)David Sikes (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- Current Rheumatology Reports (2 papers)Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (1 paper)Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism (1 paper)Rheumatology and Therapy (1 paper)The Lancet Rheumatology (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHungarySouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Diane Horowitz
8 papers receiving 303 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Nephrology 59
- Neurology 68
- Rheumatology 102
- Immunology 78
- Hematology 39
Countries citing papers authored by Diane Horowitz
This map shows the geographic impact of Diane Horowitz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diane Horowitz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diane Horowitz more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diane Horowitz
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diane Horowitz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diane Horowitz. The network helps show where Diane Horowitz may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diane Horowitz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2018 | 108 | |
| 2 | Approach to septic arthritis. | 2011 | 104 |
| 3 | 2020 | 81 | |
| 4 | 2012 | 12 | |
| 5 | 2025 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 7 | Local Area Networks with Deaf Students: Some Benefits and Some Considerations. | 1988 | 2 |
| 8 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 0 |
About Diane Horowitz
Diane Horowitz is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Rheumatology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Neurology and Immunology, having authored 9 papers that have together received 315 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research (2 papers), Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research (2 papers), Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (2 papers), Psychedelics and Drug Studies (1 paper), Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment (1 paper), Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper), Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies (1 paper) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Nephrology (59 citations), Neurology (68 citations), Rheumatology (102 citations), Immunology (78 citations) and Hematology (39 citations). Diane Horowitz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hungary and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Maria-Louise Barilla-LaBarca, Scott Horowitz, Richard Furie, Galina Marder, Nina Kello, Yaakov A. Levine, Emmett V. Glass, David Sikes, Alan Kivitz and Charles Peterfy. Their work appears in journals such as Current Rheumatology Reports, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, Seminars in Arthritis and Rheumatism, Rheumatology and Therapy and The Lancet Rheumatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.