Jacob S. Aday
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Organic Chemistry top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Information Systems and Management top 5%
- Co-authors
- Emily K. BloeschChristopher C. DavoliAlan K. DavisAnne Katrin SchlagDavid NuttJoanna C. NeillJoshua WoolleyJoshua M. Carlson
- Topics
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies (28 papers)Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (19 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEBrain Research
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomJapan
In The Last Decade
Jacob S. Aday
36 papers receiving 973 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Clinical Psychology 877
- Organic Chemistry 541
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 328
- Nutrition and Dietetics 121
- Information Systems and Management 96
Countries citing papers authored by Jacob S. Aday
This map shows the geographic impact of Jacob S. Aday's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jacob S. Aday with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jacob S. Aday more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jacob S. Aday
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jacob S. Aday. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jacob S. Aday. The network helps show where Jacob S. Aday may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jacob S. Aday
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jacob S. Aday. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jacob S. Aday based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jacob S. Aday. Jacob S. Aday is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 21 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | Great Expectations: recommendations for improving the methodological rigor of psychedelic clinical trialsbreakdown → | 133 |
| 15 | 149 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 12 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Jacob S. Aday
Jacob S. Aday is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Toxicology and Organic Chemistry, having authored 37 papers that have together received 988 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (28 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (19 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (877 citations), Organic Chemistry (541 citations) and Toxicology (64 citations). Jacob S. Aday has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Emily K. Bloesch, Christopher C. Davoli, Alan K. Davis, Anne Katrin Schlag, David Nutt, Joanna C. Neill, Joshua Woolley, Joshua M. Carlson, Ellen Bradley and Raymond C. Rosen. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.