Diana Williams

7.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
117 papers, 5.7k citations indexed

About

Diana Williams is a scholar working on Small Animals, Parasitology and Animal Science and Zoology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Williams has authored 117 papers receiving a total of 5.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 62 papers in Small Animals, 57 papers in Parasitology and 29 papers in Animal Science and Zoology. Recurrent topics in Diana Williams's work include Helminth infection and control (61 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (29 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (25 papers). Diana Williams is often cited by papers focused on Helminth infection and control (61 papers), Coccidia and coccidiosis research (29 papers) and Parasite Biology and Host Interactions (25 papers). Diana Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Kenya and United States. Diana Williams's co-authors include A. J. Trees, Jane V. Higdon, Barbara Delage, Roderick H. Dashwood, Robert F. Smith, John McGarry, Matthew Baylis, Camilla Björkman, Jane E. Hodgkinson and C.S. Guy and has published in prestigious journals such as Cell, Nature Communications and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Diana Williams

114 papers receiving 5.5k citations

Hit Papers

Cruciferous vegetables and human cancer risk: epidemiolog... 2007 2026 2013 2019 2007 250 500 750

Peers

Diana Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
  • Parasitology 2.8k
  • Small Animals 1.9k
  • Ecology 1.0k
  • Animal Science and Zoology 1.0k
  • Molecular Biology 909
Replace Grace Mulcahy with:
Grace Mulcahy Ireland
U. Wernery United Arab Emirates
Andrew Hemphill Switzerland
Terry W. Spithill Australia
Jonathan M. Wastling United Kingdom
L. Garry Adams United States
J. R. Egerton Australia
Ikuo Igarashi Japan
Mitchell S. Abrahamsen United States
Mitchell V. Palmer United States
Grace Mulcahy Ireland View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Diana Williams
Diana Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Diana Williams
Diana Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Williams. The network helps show where Diana Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Williams. Diana Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 1
2 2
3 22
4 16
5 11
6 33
7 60
8 22
9 35
10 111
11 46
12 58
13 45
14 81
15 2
16 3
17 41
18 57
19 11
20 11

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026