Diana Webster
About
In The Last Decade
Diana Webster
6 papers receiving 131 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 67
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 44
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 35
- Epidemiology 30
- Microbiology 23
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Webster
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Webster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Webster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Webster more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Webster
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Webster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Webster. The network helps show where Diana Webster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Webster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Webster. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Webster based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Webster. Diana Webster is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | 15 | |
| 3 | 24 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | Pingu Loves English | 1 |
| 7 | 61 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.