Diana Tamir

4.7k total citations
64 papers, 2.5k citations indexed

About

Diana Tamir is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Tamir has authored 64 papers receiving a total of 2.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 27 papers in Social Psychology and 14 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Diana Tamir's work include Action Observation and Synchronization (14 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers). Diana Tamir is often cited by papers focused on Action Observation and Synchronization (14 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (13 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (9 papers). Diana Tamir collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Diana Tamir's co-authors include Jason P. Mitchell, Mark Thornton, David Dodell‐Feder, Dar Meshi, Hauke R. Heekeren, Judith N. Mildner, Hal E. Hershfield, Adam Waytz, Jan B. Engelmann and Brent Hughes and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Diana Tamir

59 papers receiving 2.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Diana Tamir United States	25	1.0k	789	677	584	247	64	2.5k
Eric J. Vanman Australia	26	789 0.8×	991 1.3×	874 1.3×	583 1.0×	125 0.5×	72	2.5k
Heather C. Lench United States	26	865 0.9×	852 1.1×	483 0.7×	741 1.3×	306 1.2×	63	2.6k
Christoph Stahl Germany	25	1.3k 1.2×	584 0.7×	796 1.2×	668 1.1×	339 1.4×	71	2.5k
Karen Gasper United States	18	794 0.8×	904 1.1×	475 0.7×	777 1.3×	154 0.6×	39	2.2k
François Ric France	16	713 0.7×	1.0k 1.3×	382 0.6×	636 1.1×	255 1.0×	34	1.8k
Roland Neumann Germany	22	795 0.8×	1.3k 1.7×	823 1.2×	704 1.2×	232 0.9×	47	2.4k
Rainer Reisenzein Germany	29	1.0k 1.0×	1.4k 1.8×	547 0.8×	856 1.5×	134 0.5×	82	2.7k
Cindy Harmon‐Jones Australia	26	1.1k 1.1×	1.1k 1.4×	694 1.0×	788 1.3×	113 0.5×	54	2.9k
Hans IJzerman Netherlands	21	526 0.5×	1.1k 1.4×	573 0.8×	698 1.2×	115 0.5×	66	2.3k
Thomas Schäfer Germany	17	862 0.9×	651 0.8×	255 0.4×	423 0.7×	112 0.5×	52	2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Tamir

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Tamir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Tamir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Tamir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Tamir

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Tamir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Tamir. The network helps show where Diana Tamir may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Tamir

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Tamir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Tamir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Tamir. Diana Tamir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Tamir, Diana, et al.. (2025). Imagine before you decide: Episodic simulation increases the likelihood of choosing the simulated option.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.

Todd, Andrew R. & Diana Tamir. (2024). Factors that amplify and attenuate egocentric mentalizing. Nature Reviews Psychology. 3(3). 164–180. 8 indexed citations

Mildner, Judith N. & Diana Tamir. (2024). Why do we think? The dynamics of spontaneous thought reveal its functions. PNAS Nexus. 3(6). pgae230–pgae230. 1 indexed citations

Sened, Haran, et al.. (2024). Disentangling the effects of similarity, familiarity, and liking on social inference strategies. British Journal of Social Psychology. 64(1). e12793–e12793. 3 indexed citations

Mildner, Judith N., et al.. (2024). In-person and virtual social interactions improve well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 15. 100455–100455. 6 indexed citations

Schneider, Marilyn J., et al.. (2024). Simulation requires activation of self-knowledge to change self-concept.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 154(2). 358–377. 3 indexed citations

Thornton, Mark, et al.. (2024). Individual differences in emotion prediction and implications for social success.. Emotion. 24(7). 1697–1708.

Pagé, M. Gabrielle, Joel Katz, Karim S. Ladha, et al.. (2024). One-year opioid consumption trajectories among individuals receiving multidisciplinary postsurgical care: a single-center observational study from the Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service. Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine. 50(7). 542–552.

Sened, Haran, et al.. (2023). Egocentric projection is a rational strategy for accurate emotion prediction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 109. 104521–104521. 4 indexed citations

10.

Tamir, Diana, et al.. (2023). Caregiver speech predicts the emergence of children's emotion vocabulary. Child Development. 94(3). 585–602. 8 indexed citations

11.

Setton, Roni, Ibai Díez, Elisenda Bueichekú, et al.. (2023). Creativity at rest: Exploring functional network connectivity of creative experts. Network Neuroscience. 7(3). 1022–1033. 5 indexed citations

12.

Thornton, Mark, et al.. (2023). Transition dynamics shape mental state concepts.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 152(10). 2804–2829. 8 indexed citations

13.

Pagé, M. Gabrielle, Aliza Weinrib, Alexander Huang, et al.. (2021). Predictors of one year chronic post-surgical pain trajectories following thoracic surgery. Journal of Anesthesia. 35(4). 505–514. 23 indexed citations

14.

Thornton, Mark, et al.. (2020). Accurate emotion prediction in dyads and groups and its potential social benefits.. Emotion. 22(5). 1030–1043. 9 indexed citations

15.

Mildner, Judith N. & Diana Tamir. (2019). Spontaneous Thought as an Unconstrained Memory Process. Trends in Neurosciences. 42(11). 763–777. 42 indexed citations

16.

Wassermann, Eric M., et al.. (2019). Seizures from transcranial magnetic stimulation 2012–2016: Results of a survey of active laboratories and clinics. Clinical Neurophysiology. 130(8). 1409–1416. 87 indexed citations

17.

Clarke, Hance, Janice Montbriand, Judith Nicholls, et al.. (2018). Opioid weaning and pain management in postsurgical patients at the Toronto General Hospital Transitional Pain Service. Canadian Journal of Pain. 2(1). 236–247. 46 indexed citations

18.

Thornton, Mark, et al.. (2018). The Social Brain Automatically Predicts Others' Future Mental States. Journal of Neuroscience. 39(1). 140–148. 48 indexed citations

19.

Tamir, Diana, et al.. (2018). Media usage diminishes memory for experiences. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 76. 161–168. 54 indexed citations

20.

Montbriand, Janice, Aliza Weinrib, Muhammad Abid Azam, et al.. (2017). Smoking, Pain Intensity, and Opioid Consumption 1–3 Months After Major Surgery: A Retrospective Study in a Hospital-Based Transitional Pain Service. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 20(9). 1144–1151. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact