Diana Rofail
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Schizophrenia research and treatment 4
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research 2
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Family Caregiving in Mental Illness 5
-
- Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders 5
-
- Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies 2
-
- Iron Metabolism and Disorders 3
-
- Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations 3
-
- Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare 2
- Co-authors
- Linda Abetz‐WebbSteven H. ZaritAntje ColligsAdam GaterChris MarshallCarmen Galani BerardoChloe TolleyLinda Abetz
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (1 paper)Blood (3 papers)Alzheimer s & Dementia (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Diana Rofail
17 papers receiving 282 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
- Family Practice 17
- Psychiatry and Mental health 99
- Clinical Psychology 136
- Genetics 35
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 56
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Rofail
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Rofail's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Rofail with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Rofail more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Rofail
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Rofail. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Rofail. The network helps show where Diana Rofail may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Diana Rofail, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2017 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2017 | 8 | |
| 3 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 12 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 19 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 18 | |
| 9 | 2014 | 80 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 43 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2008 | 30 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 4 |
About Diana Rofail
Diana Rofail is a scholar working on Genetics, Psychiatry and Mental health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Family Caregiving in Mental Illness (5 papers), Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders (5 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (4 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (3 papers), Spinal Dysraphism and Malformations (3 papers), Pharmacological Effects and Toxicity Studies (2 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (2 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (17 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (99 citations) and Clinical Psychology (136 citations). Diana Rofail has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Linda Abetz‐Webb, Steven H. Zarit, Antje Colligs, Adam Gater, Chris Marshall, Carmen Galani Berardo, Chloe Tolley, Linda Abetz, Jean‐François Baladi and Muriel Viala. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Blood and Alzheimer s & Dementia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.