Diana Richter

1.2k total citations
51 papers, 882 citations indexed

About

Diana Richter is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Sociology and Political Science and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Diana Richter has authored 51 papers receiving a total of 882 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 25 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 12 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Diana Richter's work include Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (27 papers), Family Support in Illness (23 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (12 papers). Diana Richter is often cited by papers focused on Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (27 papers), Family Support in Illness (23 papers) and Cancer survivorship and care (12 papers). Diana Richter collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Diana Richter's co-authors include Kristina Geue, Annekathrin Sender, Ricarda Schmidt, Kurt Hahlweg, Anja Mehnert, Elmar Brähler, Michael Friedrich, Yve Stöbel‐Richter, Steven D. Morley and Evelyn Kleinert and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Scientific Reports and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Diana Richter

48 papers receiving 850 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Diana Richter Germany 13 353 296 251 211 193 51 882
Joël Vos Netherlands 19 203 0.6× 220 0.7× 166 0.7× 182 0.9× 224 1.2× 48 1.1k
Johanna Czamanski‐Cohen Israel 14 84 0.2× 49 0.2× 58 0.2× 67 0.3× 213 1.1× 39 536
Rony E. Duncan Australia 17 315 0.9× 256 0.9× 30 0.1× 108 0.5× 39 0.2× 34 931
Sallie Foley United States 10 98 0.3× 105 0.4× 113 0.5× 39 0.2× 85 0.4× 16 492
Hanne C. Lie Norway 21 485 1.4× 325 1.1× 342 1.4× 302 1.4× 70 0.4× 75 1.2k
Hae‐Chung Yang United States 13 288 0.8× 226 0.8× 595 2.4× 128 0.6× 79 0.4× 17 940
Martina Rauchfuß Germany 17 108 0.3× 68 0.2× 100 0.4× 352 1.7× 61 0.3× 51 872
Claudia Cormio Italy 18 181 0.5× 227 0.8× 382 1.5× 235 1.1× 31 0.2× 29 782
Andrew Gotowiec Canada 15 67 0.2× 107 0.4× 84 0.3× 91 0.4× 120 0.6× 16 668
Karine Kleinhaus United States 18 369 1.0× 47 0.2× 108 0.4× 228 1.1× 87 0.5× 36 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Richter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Richter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Richter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Richter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Richter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Richter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Richter. The network helps show where Diana Richter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Richter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Richter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Richter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Richter. Diana Richter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Richter, Diana, Annekathrin Sender, Jenny Rosendahl, et al.. (2025). Exploring how attachment insecurities mediate the link between sexual and partnership satisfaction in adolescents and young adults with cancer. Acta Oncologica. 64. 96–104.
2.
Hinz, Andréas, Peter Esser, Diana Richter, et al.. (2025). Social support in a large general population sample over the course of six years. Scientific Reports. 15(1). 6405–6405. 1 indexed citations
3.
Friedrich, Michael, Annekathrin Sender, Diana Richter, et al.. (2024). Occupational adjustments and work ability of young adult cancer survivors: results from the AYA-Leipzig study. Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology. 151(1). 20–20. 1 indexed citations
4.
Hinz, Andreas, Thomas Schulte, Anja Mehnert, et al.. (2024). Fear of Cancer Progression: A Comparison between the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-12) and the Concerns about Recurrence Questionnaire (CARQ-4). Healthcare. 12(4). 435–435. 4 indexed citations
5.
6.
Hinz, Andreas, et al.. (2023). The Relationship between Supportive Care Needs and Health-Related Quality of Life in Cancer Patients. Healthcare. 11(15). 2161–2161. 1 indexed citations
7.
Geue, Kristina, Michael Friedrich, Annekathrin Sender, et al.. (2021). Health Behavior and Associated Factors in Young Adult Cancer Patients. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 697096–697096. 8 indexed citations
8.
Leuteritz, Katja, Michael Friedrich, Annekathrin Sender, et al.. (2020). Return to Work and Employment Situation of Young Adult Cancer Survivors: Results from the Adolescent and Young Adult-Leipzig Study. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology. 10(2). 226–233. 34 indexed citations
9.
Richter, Diana, Anja Mehnert, Dirk Forstmeyer, Jochen Ernst, & Kristina Geue. (2019). Health Literacy in Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Patients and Its Association with Health Outcomes. Journal of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology. 8(4). 451–457. 20 indexed citations
10.
Richter, Diana, et al.. (2018). Validation of the German version of the late adolescence and young adulthood survivorship-related quality of life measure (LAYA-SRQL). Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 16(1). 26–26. 5 indexed citations
11.
Sender, Annekathrin, et al.. (2015). Patient-Physician Communication and Knowledge Regarding Fertility Issues from German Oncologists’ Perspective—a Quantitative Survey. Journal of Cancer Education. 31(1). 115–122. 11 indexed citations
12.
Helm, M., Diana Richter, Alexander Schramm, L. Lampl, & Björn Hoßfeld. (2012). Ist die intraossäre Punktion ein alternativer Gefäßzugang beim Notfall in der zahnärztlichen Praxis?. Notfall + Rettungsmedizin. 16(1). 27–32.
13.
Richter, Diana, et al.. (2012). Standardisierte Verfahren in der empirischen Sexualforschung - Ein Update. Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung. 25(2). 93–130. 2 indexed citations
14.
Ernst, Jochen, et al.. (2011). Elternschaft und Krebs. Familiendynamik. 36(1). 44–51. 1 indexed citations
15.
Hahlweg, Kurt & Diana Richter. (2010). Prevention of marital instability and distress. Results of an 11-year longitudinal follow-up study. Behaviour Research and Therapy. 48(5). 377–383. 78 indexed citations
16.
Richter, Diana, et al.. (2010). Fertilität und Krebs – Skizzierung des Problemfeldes. PPmP - Psychotherapie · Psychosomatik · Medizinische Psychologie. 61(6). 246–253. 3 indexed citations
17.
Geue, Kristina, et al.. (2010). An overview of art therapy interventions for cancer patients and the results of research. Complementary Therapies in Medicine. 18(3-4). 160–170. 120 indexed citations
18.
Richter, Diana, et al.. (1995). [Causal attributions and coping with illness by breast cancer patients: results of a longitudinal study].. PubMed. 41(4). 356–69. 4 indexed citations
19.
Buddeberg, Claus, et al.. (1990). [The significance of psychosocial factors for the course of breast cancer--results of a prospective follow-up study].. PubMed. 141(5). 429–55. 3 indexed citations
20.
Buddeberg, Claus, et al.. (1989). [Causal attributions and coping with illness in patients with breast cancer].. PubMed. 39(7). 232–8. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joël Vos Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Johanna Czamanski‐Cohen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rony E. Duncan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sallie Foley Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hanne C. Lie Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hae‐Chung Yang Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Martina Rauchfuß Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Claudia Cormio Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrew Gotowiec Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Karine Kleinhaus
Rankless by CCL
2026