Hae‐Chung Yang

15 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers

Hae‐Chung Yang
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Oncology 510
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 45
  • Biological Psychiatry 30
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 131
  • Applied Psychology 40
Replace Timothy R. Crespin with:
Timothy R. Crespin United States
Laura C. Bouchard United States
Lisa M. Gudenkauf United States
Annemarie Braamse Netherlands
Haldun Soygür Türkiye
Kristin Härtl Germany
Heather Leutwyler United States
Elvan Özalp Türkiye
Kate M. Rancourt Canada
Lisa M. Wu United States
Hae‐Chung Yang relative to Timothy R. Crespin United States Timothy R. Crespin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.9×
Timothy R. Crespin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Hae‐Chung Yang

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hae‐Chung Yang's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hae‐Chung Yang with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hae‐Chung Yang more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hae‐Chung Yang

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hae‐Chung Yang. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hae‐Chung Yang. The network helps show where Hae‐Chung Yang may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Hae‐Chung Yang, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Hae‐Chung Yang Line = papers co-authored together Hae‐Chung Yang links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 2008322
2 2010113
3 201185
4 200982
5 200866
6 200864
7 200852
8 201147
9 200741
10 201324
11 201120
12 202318
13 201415
14 20182
15
The effects of gender role ideology, wife's employment, and perceived equity on marital quality: A case of young middle-class couples in Korea
20041
16 20170
17 20200

About Hae‐Chung Yang

Hae‐Chung Yang is a scholar working on Oncology, Sociology and Political Science, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 17 papers that have together received 952 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cancer survivorship and care (10 papers), Psychosocial Factors Impacting Youth (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (1 paper), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (1 paper), Diverse Approaches in Healthcare and Education Studies (1 paper), Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies (1 paper), Cancer, Stress, Anesthesia, and Immune Response (1 paper) and Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (510 citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (45 citations), Biological Psychiatry (30 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (131 citations) and Applied Psychology (40 citations). Hae‐Chung Yang has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Barbara L. Andersen, Lisa M. Thornton, William E. Carson, Charles F. Emery, William B. Farrar, Deanna M. Golden‐Kreutz, Donn C. Young, Charles L. Shapiro, Tammy A. Schuler and Brittany M. Brothers. Their work appears in journals such as Cancer, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Clinical Cancer Research, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Annals of Behavioral Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact