Diana Moreira
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Mechanical Engineering
- Co-authors
- José C.M. PiresFernando BarbosaAndreia AzeredoMarta PintoPaulo C. DiasFilipe Nunes RibeiroPatricia GullónBeatriz Gullón
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (16 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (12 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBioresource TechnologyPersonality and Individual Differences
- Partner nations
- PortugalSpainUnited States
In The Last Decade
Diana Moreira
67 papers receiving 779 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 132
- Clinical Psychology 257
- Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 109
- Social Psychology 89
- Sociology and Political Science 89
- Mechanical Engineering 66
Countries citing papers authored by Diana Moreira
This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Moreira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Moreira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Moreira more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Moreira
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Moreira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Moreira. The network helps show where Diana Moreira may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Moreira
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Moreira. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Moreira based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Moreira. Diana Moreira is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Depression and Psychotherapy: The Importance of a Psychotherapeutic Approach Focused on Logical Reasoning and Functioning | 1 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Diana Moreira
Diana Moreira is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Decision Sciences and Applied Psychology, having authored 78 papers that have together received 811 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (16 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (12 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (257 citations), General Decision Sciences (20 citations) and Applied Psychology (39 citations). Diana Moreira has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and United States. Frequent co-authors include José C.M. Pires, Fernando Barbosa, Andreia Azeredo, Marta Pinto, Paulo C. Dias, Filipe Nunes Ribeiro, Patricia Gullón, Beatriz Gullón, Freni K. Tavaria and Ana Gomes. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Bioresource Technology and Personality and Individual Differences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.