Diana Davis

39 papers receiving 955 citations

Peers

Diana Davis
Comparison fields: 5 of 137
  • Sociology and Political Science 226
  • Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 212
  • Global and Planetary Change 177
  • Political Science and International Relations 170
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 141
Replace Fiona Walsh with:
Fiona Walsh Australia
Preston E. James United States
Mark Nuttall Canada
Niina Käyhkö Finland
Barbara Neis Canada
Thayer Scudder United States
Detlef Müller‐Mahn Germany
Hans G. Bohle Germany
Peter Atkins United Kingdom
Ian Reeve Australia
Diana Davis relative to Fiona Walsh Australia Fiona Walsh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×20×40×60×70.5×
Fiona Walsh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Diana Davis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Diana Davis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Diana Davis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Diana Davis more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Diana Davis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Diana Davis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Diana Davis. The network helps show where Diana Davis may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Diana Davis

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Diana Davis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Diana Davis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Diana Davis. Diana Davis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 0
3 29
4 1
5 35
6 81
7 4
8 57
9 116
10 1
11 6
12
First we see: the national review of visual education
44
13
Resurrecting the Granary of Rome: Environmental History and French ColonialExpansion in North Africa
118
14
Resurrecting the Granary of Rome: Environmental History and French Colonial Expansion in North Africa
104
15
Rangeland production in Afghanistan
1
16
Eco-Governance in French Algeria: Environmental History, Policy, and Colonial Administration
4
17 40
18 4
19 2
20 16

About Diana Davis

Diana Davis is a scholar working on Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Forestry and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology (12 papers), African Botany and Ecology Studies (4 papers) and Agriculture and Rural Development Research (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (212 citations), Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (86 citations) and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (112 citations). Diana Davis has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Christopher A. Conte, Paul Robbins, Brandon T. Bestelmeyer, Nathan F. Sayre, Albert E. Sollod, David Μ. Sherman, Pierre Hiernaux, Matthew D. Turner, Emily T. Yeh and Lynette A. Scherer. Their work appears in journals such as Lara D. Veeken, Annual Review of Environment and Resources and Geographical Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026