Detlef Liebs
- Anthropology top 10%
- History top 10%
- Archeology top 10%
- Classics top 10%
- Religious studies top 10%
- Co-authors
- Wolfgang ΚunkelHugh KennedyBryan Ward‐PerkinsClifford AndoMichael McCormickAndrea GiardinaAveril CameronRoger Collins
- Topics
- Classical Studies and Legal History (15 papers)Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (6 papers)Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers)
- Cited by
- ClassicsAnthropologyHistory
- Journals
- American Journal of Legal HistoryMélanges de l École française de Rome AntiquitéTijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Detlef Liebs
20 papers receiving 30 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 15
- Anthropology 29
- History 26
- Archeology 17
- Classics 16
- Religious studies 9
Countries citing papers authored by Detlef Liebs
This map shows the geographic impact of Detlef Liebs's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Detlef Liebs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Detlef Liebs more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Detlef Liebs
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Detlef Liebs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Detlef Liebs. The network helps show where Detlef Liebs may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Detlef Liebs
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Detlef Liebs. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Detlef Liebs based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Detlef Liebs. Detlef Liebs is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Vor den Richtern Roms : berühmte Prozesse der Antike | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | Die Römischen Juristen : Herkunft und soziale Stellung | 3 |
| 11 | Lateinische Rechtsregeln und Rechtssprichwörter | 3 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Römische Jurisprudenz in Africa : mit Studien zu den pseudopaulinischen Sentenzen | 1 |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Detlef Liebs
Detlef Liebs is a scholar working on Classics, History and Law, having authored 29 papers that have together received 55 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Studies and Legal History (15 papers), Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction (6 papers) and Classical Antiquity Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (16 citations), Anthropology (29 citations) and History (26 citations). Detlef Liebs has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Wolfgang Κunkel, Hugh Kennedy, Bryan Ward‐Perkins, Clifford Ando, Michael McCormick, Andrea Giardina, Averil Cameron, Roger Collins, J. H. W. G. Liebeschuetz and James F. Keenan. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Legal History, Mélanges de l École française de Rome Antiquité and Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.