des Anges Cruser

12 papers receiving 285 citations

Peers

des Anges Cruser
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Clinical Psychology 132
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 40
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 68
  • Pharmacology 74
  • General Health Professions 73
Replace Soon Bok Chang with:
Soon Bok Chang South Korea
Catherine Ling United States
Angélica M. Díaz-Martínez United States
Lyndon Amorin-Woods Australia
Kitty Novy Australia
Dale Dirkse Canada
Kari Leibowitz United States
Jan Valentini Germany
Rebecca Clifford United Kingdom
Keith R. Linsley United Kingdom
des Anges Cruser relative to Soon Bok Chang South Korea Soon Bok Chang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Soon Bok Chang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by des Anges Cruser

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of des Anges Cruser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by des Anges Cruser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites des Anges Cruser more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by des Anges Cruser

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by des Anges Cruser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by des Anges Cruser. The network helps show where des Anges Cruser may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 23 scholars most cited alongside des Anges Cruser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with des Anges Cruser Line = papers co-authored together des Anges Cruser links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

13 of 13 papers shown
#Work
1 2001157
2 201442
3 201231
4 201423
5 200921
6
Osteopathic manipulative treatment of somatic dysfunction among patients in the family practice clinic setting: a retrospective analysis.
200518
7 200515
8 201012
9 20123
10 20002
11 20001
12 19991
13 19951

About des Anges Cruser

des Anges Cruser is a scholar working on Pharmacology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (2 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (2 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper) and Crime Patterns and Interventions (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (132 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (40 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (68 citations), Pharmacology (74 citations) and General Health Professions (73 citations) des Anges Cruser has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Pamela M. Diamond, Christopher S. Thomas, Charles E. Holzer, Eugene W. Wang, Kendi Hensel, John C. Licciardone, Douglas Maurer, Robert J Bulik, Scott T. Stoll and Thomas Glonek. Their work appears in journals such as Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, Journal of Correctional Health Care, Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact