Scott T. Stoll
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Surgery
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Kimberly G. FuldaJohn C. LicciardoneHollis H. KingH. Fred DowneyKendi HenselDavid P. RussoE. Marty KnottJohnathan D. Tune
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers)Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (5 papers)Lymphatic System and Diseases (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaSlovakia
In The Last Decade
Scott T. Stoll
30 papers receiving 706 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Pharmacology 345
- Cell Biology 190
- Surgery 153
- Psychiatry and Mental health 140
- Cognitive Neuroscience 127
Countries citing papers authored by Scott T. Stoll
This map shows the geographic impact of Scott T. Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott T. Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott T. Stoll more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Scott T. Stoll
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott T. Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott T. Stoll. The network helps show where Scott T. Stoll may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott T. Stoll
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott T. Stoll. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott T. Stoll based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott T. Stoll. Scott T. Stoll is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | 76 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 84 | |
| 10 | 18 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 42 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | Hemodynamic effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment immediately after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. | 29 |
| 18 | 160 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Development of the Attitudes Toward Osteopathic Principles and Practice Scale (ATOPPS): preliminary results. | 3 |
About Scott T. Stoll
Scott T. Stoll is a scholar working on Transplantation, Anatomy and Pharmacology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 787 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (7 papers), Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment (5 papers) and Lymphatic System and Diseases (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and Manual Therapy (47 citations), Pharmacology (345 citations) and Complementary and alternative medicine (112 citations). Scott T. Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Kimberly G. Fulda, John C. Licciardone, Hollis H. King, H. Fred Downey, Kendi Hensel, David P. Russo, E. Marty Knott, Johnathan D. Tune, Paul R. Standley and Russell G. Gamber. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Immunology, Spine and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.