Dennis W. Hazel

535 total citations
34 papers, 422 citations indexed

About

Dennis W. Hazel is a scholar working on Global and Planetary Change, Agronomy and Crop Science and Mechanics of Materials. According to data from OpenAlex, Dennis W. Hazel has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 422 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Global and Planetary Change, 15 papers in Agronomy and Crop Science and 12 papers in Mechanics of Materials. Recurrent topics in Dennis W. Hazel's work include Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (15 papers) and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (12 papers). Dennis W. Hazel is often cited by papers focused on Forest Management and Policy (16 papers), Bioenergy crop production and management (15 papers) and Forest Biomass Utilization and Management (12 papers). Dennis W. Hazel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Malawi and Sweden. Dennis W. Hazel's co-authors include Elizabeth Guthrie Nichols, Christopher E. Moorman, Sarah R. Fritts, Steven B. Castleberry, Steven M. Grodsky, Jessica A. Homyack, Christopher Maier, Brian D. Jackson, Ronald S. Zalesny and Douglas J. Frederick and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Science of The Total Environment and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Dennis W. Hazel

30 papers receiving 401 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dennis W. Hazel United States 14 238 183 116 104 103 34 422
Eric B. Sucre United States 12 178 0.7× 202 1.1× 93 0.8× 79 0.8× 90 0.9× 33 443
Lars Rytter Sweden 17 365 1.5× 423 2.3× 152 1.3× 128 1.2× 431 4.2× 33 776
Laura James United Kingdom 5 76 0.3× 127 0.7× 49 0.4× 48 0.5× 67 0.7× 6 352
P. Paris Italy 13 270 1.1× 292 1.6× 128 1.1× 46 0.4× 160 1.6× 28 773
Jamie L. Schuler United States 9 181 0.8× 37 0.2× 49 0.4× 142 1.4× 142 1.4× 47 427
Gianfranco Minotta Italy 12 274 1.2× 104 0.6× 58 0.5× 64 0.6× 318 3.1× 23 664
J.W. Ranney United States 7 101 0.4× 124 0.7× 78 0.7× 38 0.4× 94 0.9× 17 269
Stephen Mitchell United States 10 455 1.9× 62 0.3× 69 0.6× 126 1.2× 115 1.1× 13 532
Inge Vande Walle Belgium 7 154 0.6× 92 0.5× 50 0.4× 71 0.7× 117 1.1× 7 347
Rose-Marie Rytter Sweden 14 185 0.8× 323 1.8× 104 0.9× 145 1.4× 212 2.1× 19 652

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis W. Hazel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis W. Hazel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis W. Hazel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis W. Hazel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis W. Hazel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis W. Hazel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis W. Hazel. The network helps show where Dennis W. Hazel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis W. Hazel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis W. Hazel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis W. Hazel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis W. Hazel. Dennis W. Hazel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moorman, Christopher E., et al.. (2020). Ground-Dwelling Invertebrate Abundance Positively Related to Volume of Logging Residues in the Southern Appalachians, USA. Forests. 11(11). 1149–1149. 4 indexed citations
2.
Zalesny, Ronald S., Göran Berndes, Ioannis Dimitriou, et al.. (2019). Positive water linkages of producing short rotation poplars and willows for bioenergy and phytotechnologies. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment. 8(5). 30 indexed citations
4.
Wright, Jeff, et al.. (2019). Matching site-suitable poplars to rotation length for optimized productivity. Forest Ecology and Management. 457. 117670–117670. 12 indexed citations
5.
Zalesny, Ronald S., William L. Headlee, Gayathri Gopalakrishnan, et al.. (2019). Ecosystem services of poplar at long‐term phytoremediation sites in the Midwest and Southeast, United States. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Energy and Environment. 8(6). 21 indexed citations
6.
Fritts, Sarah R., Christopher E. Moorman, Steven M. Grodsky, et al.. (2017). Rodent response to harvesting woody biomass for bioenergy production. Journal of Wildlife Management. 81(7). 1170–1178. 13 indexed citations
8.
Hazel, Dennis W., et al.. (2016). Coupling aquaculture with forest plantations for food, energy, and water resiliency. The Science of The Total Environment. 571. 1262–1270. 15 indexed citations
9.
Hazel, Dennis W., et al.. (2016). Sub-Soiling and Genotype Selection Improves Populus Productivity Grown on a North Carolina Sandy Soil. Forests. 7(4). 74–74. 5 indexed citations
10.
Hazel, Dennis W., et al.. (2015). SRWC bioenergy productivity and economic feasibility on marginal lands. Journal of Environmental Management. 160. 57–66. 38 indexed citations
11.
Diaz, John, et al.. (2014). A Framework for Integrating and Managing Expectations of Multiple Stakeholder Groups in a Collaborative Partnership. Journal of Extension. 52(3). 2 indexed citations
12.
Fritts, Sarah R., Christopher E. Moorman, Dennis W. Hazel, & Brian D. Jackson. (2014). Biomass Harvesting Guidelines affect downed woody debris retention. Biomass and Bioenergy. 70. 382–391. 35 indexed citations
13.
Fritts, Sarah R., Christopher E. Moorman, Steven M. Grodsky, et al.. (2014). Shrew response to variable woody debris retention: Implications for sustainable forest bioenergy. Forest Ecology and Management. 336. 35–43. 22 indexed citations
14.
Hazel, Dennis W., et al.. (2013). Species Trials of Short Rotation Woody Crops on Two Wastewater Application Sites in North Carolina, USA. BioEnergy Research. 7(1). 157–173. 19 indexed citations
15.
Hazel, Dennis W., et al.. (2012). Landowners' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Aspirations Towards Woody Biomass Markets in North Carolina. Journal of Extension. 50(3). 5 indexed citations
16.
Cubbage, Frederick W., et al.. (2012). Opinions of Forest Managers, Loggers, and Forest Landowners in North Carolina regarding Biomass Harvesting Guidelines. International Journal of Forestry Research. 2012. 1–15. 18 indexed citations
17.
Hazel, Dennis W., et al.. (2012). Landowners' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Aspirations Towards Woody Biomass Markets in North Carolina. Journal of Extension. 50(4). 7 indexed citations
18.
Hazel, Dennis W., et al.. (2008). Evaluating wood energy users in North Carolina and the potential for using logging chips to expand wood fuel use.. Forest Products Journal. 58(5). 34–39. 2 indexed citations
19.
Hazel, Dennis W., et al.. (2008). Integrated practices for reducing sediment loss from Piedmont tobacco fields. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation. 63(3). 143–152. 5 indexed citations
20.
Franklin, E. C. & Dennis W. Hazel. (1983). Timber Mart-SouthHow Good Is It?. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry. 7(4). 190–194. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026