Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Very strong low temperature bainite
2002447 citationsFrancisca G. Caballero, H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia et al.Materials Science and Technologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Jones more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Jones. The network helps show where Dennis Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis Jones.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis Jones based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis Jones. Dennis Jones is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones, Dennis, et al.. (2019). The use of bicine and tricine as possible Maillard reagents in a combined thermal/chemical modification of beech. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology).1 indexed citations
Jones, Dennis, et al.. (2011). From Modification to Accommodation: High School to College Transition Issues for Students with Learning Disabilities.1 indexed citations
Chou, Chu-Yang, et al.. (2009). Draft toxicological profile for perfluoroalkyls.66 indexed citations
8.
Ingerman, Lisa, et al.. (2008). Toxicological profile for aluminum.119 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Dennis, Jewell Crawford, Dennis Jones, et al.. (2007). Draft toxicological profile for 1,4-dioxane.1 indexed citations
10.
Faroon, Obaid, Dennis Jones, & Gabrielle Todd. (2006). Toxicological profile for vinyl chloride.59 indexed citations
11.
Tylenda, Carolyn A. & Dennis Jones. (2003). Toxicological profile for fluorides, hydrogen fluoride, and fluorine.109 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Dennis, et al.. (2003). Planning for CyberLearning: A Framework for Counselor Educators..1 indexed citations
13.
Caballero, Francisca G., H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, K. J. A. Mawella, Dennis Jones, & Paul Brown. (2002). Very strong low temperature bainite. Materials Science and Technology. 18(3). 279–284.447 indexed citations breakdown →
Caballero, Francisca G., H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, K. J. A. Mawella, Dennis Jones, & Paul Brown. (2002). Diseño de nuevos aceros bainíticos.. Revista de Metalurgia. 38(1). 3–13.
16.
Jones, Dennis, et al.. (2001). High Tech/High Touch: Distance Learning in Counselor Preparation..5 indexed citations
17.
Caballero, Francisca G., H. K. D. H. Bhadeshia, K. J. A. Mawella, Dennis Jones, & Paul Brown. (2001). Design of novel high strength bainitic steels: Part 1. Materials Science and Technology. 17(5). 512–516.230 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.