Dennis Hummel

615 total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

Dennis Hummel is a scholar working on Marketing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Dennis Hummel has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Marketing, 2 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Dennis Hummel's work include Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers). Dennis Hummel is often cited by papers focused on Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Environmental Education and Sustainability (2 papers) and Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers). Dennis Hummel collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Austria. Dennis Hummel's co-authors include Alexander Maedche, Tobias Vogel and Alexander Mädche and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Journal of Consumer Behaviour and Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics.

In The Last Decade

Dennis Hummel

8 papers receiving 344 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies

2019 294 citations Dennis Hummel, Alexander Maedche Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics profile →

Peers

Dennis Hummel

SPS

MARKE

AP

EE

MMPL

Andreas Maaløe Jespersen Denmark

Thomas Scheuerle Germany

Mette Trier Damgaard Denmark

Priyali Rajagopal United States

Christoph Ungemach United States

Luigina Canova Italy

Christine Eckert Australia

Yitong Wang China

William J. Montford United States

Andreas Maaløe Jespersen Denmark

Dennis Hummel

128 ×1.7

SPS

52 ×0.7

MARKE

99 ×1.4

AP

84 ×1.4

EE

58 ×1.0

MMPL

Citations per year, relative to Dennis Hummel Dennis Hummel (= 1×) peers Andreas Maaløe Jespersen

Countries citing papers authored by Dennis Hummel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dennis Hummel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dennis Hummel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dennis Hummel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dennis Hummel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dennis Hummel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dennis Hummel. The network helps show where Dennis Hummel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dennis Hummel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dennis Hummel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dennis Hummel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dennis Hummel. Dennis Hummel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Hummel, Dennis, et al.. (2020). Who can be nudged? Examining nudging effectiveness in the context of need for cognition and need for uniqueness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour. 20(2). 324–336. 29 indexed citations

2.

Hummel, Dennis & Alexander Maedche. (2019). How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics. 80. 47–58. 294 indexed citations breakdown →

3.

Hummel, Dennis, et al.. (2018). Improving Digital Nudging Using Attentive User Interfaces: Theory Development and Experiment Design. 1. 5 indexed citations

4.

Hummel, Dennis, et al.. (2018). Reinforcing gender equality by analysing female teenagers' performances in coding activities. Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research). 209–219. 10 indexed citations

5.

Hummel, Dennis, et al.. (2018). Biological sex vs. psychological gender-roles in online channel choices. 199–208. 2 indexed citations

6.

Hummel, Dennis, et al.. (2017). Multi-Channel Choice in Retail Banking Services: Exploring the Role of Service Characteristics. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 619. 5 indexed citations

7.

Hummel, Dennis, et al.. (2017). DESIGNING ADAPTIVE NUDGES FOR MULTI-CHANNEL CHOICES OF DIGITAL SERVICES: A LABORATORY EXPERIMENT DESIGN. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 2677. 4 indexed citations

8.

Hummel, Dennis, et al.. (2016). Determinants of Multi-Channel Behavior: Exploring Avenues for Future Research in the Services Industry. International Conference on Information Systems. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact