Denise Williams

13 total papers · 531 total citations
6 papers, 191 citations indexed

About

Denise Williams is a scholar working on Genetics, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, Denise Williams has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 191 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Genetics, 3 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 2 papers in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in Denise Williams's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers) and Ocular Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). Denise Williams is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (3 papers), Genomics and Rare Diseases (2 papers) and Ocular Disorders and Treatments (2 papers). Denise Williams collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Saudi Arabia. Denise Williams's co-authors include Eamonn R. Maher, Dominic McMullan, Tamás Marton, Esther Meyer, M.R. Abdollahi, Eamonn Sheridan, Bruce E. Hayward, Yasmin Abdul Rashid, Graham R. Taylor and Michel De Vos and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Human Mutation and Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Denise Williams

5 papers receiving 190 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Denise Williams	115	101	73	69	18	6	191
Catherine Deveault	109 0.9×	153 1.5×	143 2.0×	123 1.8×	5 0.3×	7	281
Tamar Goldwaser	142 1.2×	113 1.1×	54 0.7×	21 0.3×	2 0.1×	7	291
Muneera Al-Husain	38 0.3×	74 0.7×	68 0.9×	20 0.3×	2 0.1×	9	177
Brian D. Kuchinka	151 1.3×	162 1.6×	84 1.2×	17 0.2×		8	237
A. Picou	96 0.8×	17 0.2×	56 0.8×	144 2.1×		10	248
Carl G. P. Platou	7 0.1×	88 0.9×	54 0.7×	26 0.4×	12 0.7×	7	182
Tonia Doerksen	74 0.6×	44 0.4×	116 1.6×	72 1.0×		7	226
Alicia Braxton	137 1.2×	128 1.3×	39 0.5×	22 0.3×	1 0.1×	6	221
Cristina González-González	209 1.8×	93 0.9×	51 0.7×	11 0.2×	2 0.1×	12	253
Isabella Aprea	35 0.3×	142 1.4×	89 1.2×	32 0.5×		7	230

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Williams

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Williams

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Williams. The network helps show where Denise Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Williams. Denise Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact