Denise Wallace

792 total citations
18 papers, 557 citations indexed

About

Denise Wallace is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Biophysics and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Denise Wallace has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 557 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Biophysics and 4 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Denise Wallace's work include Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Denise Wallace is often cited by papers focused on Electromagnetic Fields and Biological Effects (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Denise Wallace collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Italy. Denise Wallace's co-authors include Riccardo Russo, Elaine Fox, Stacy Eltiti, Nicholas R. Cooper, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Konstantina Zougkou, Anna Ridgewell, Silke Paulmann, Francisco Sepulveda and Stephen Joseph and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Environmental Health Perspectives and Neuropsychologia.

In The Last Decade

Denise Wallace

17 papers receiving 538 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Denise Wallace United Kingdom 12 228 222 129 114 89 18 557
Kelly Garner Australia 12 44 0.2× 290 1.3× 37 0.3× 22 0.2× 109 1.2× 33 516
Victor Vorobyev Finland 15 36 0.2× 387 1.7× 42 0.3× 8 0.1× 46 0.5× 23 547
Leah Casuto United States 11 3 0.0× 154 0.7× 202 1.6× 12 0.1× 161 1.8× 15 732
Natasha Marston Australia 9 4 0.0× 296 1.3× 487 3.8× 7 0.1× 198 2.2× 18 746
Katherine L. Bottenhorn United States 13 5 0.0× 280 1.3× 16 0.1× 20 0.2× 47 0.5× 33 459
Chiara Bulgarelli United Kingdom 12 9 0.0× 288 1.3× 12 0.1× 3 0.0× 49 0.6× 20 521
Sarah C. Lidstone Canada 14 3 0.0× 284 1.3× 95 0.7× 7 0.1× 308 3.5× 31 815
Sabrina Schneider Germany 10 11 0.0× 290 1.3× 62 0.5× 1 0.0× 70 0.8× 20 518
Noa Tsujii Japan 14 4 0.0× 201 0.9× 17 0.1× 5 0.0× 160 1.8× 39 438
Diana Mitchell Canada 16 6 0.0× 285 1.3× 298 2.3× 5 0.0× 10 0.1× 42 592

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Wallace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Wallace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Wallace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Wallace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Wallace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Wallace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Wallace. The network helps show where Denise Wallace may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Wallace

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Wallace. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Wallace based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Wallace. Denise Wallace is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Wallace, Denise, Nicholas R. Cooper, Alejandra Sel, & Riccardo Russo. (2023). The social readjustment rating scale: Updated and modernised. PLoS ONE. 18(12). e0295943–e0295943. 9 indexed citations
2.
Wallace, Denise, Nicholas R. Cooper, Alejandra Sel, & Riccardo Russo. (2023). Do non-traumatic stressful life events and ageing negatively impact working memory performance and do they interact to further impair working memory performance?. PLoS ONE. 18(11). e0290635–e0290635.
3.
Russo, Riccardo, et al.. (2022). Different stages of emotional prosody processing in healthy ageing–evidence from behavioural responses, ERPs, tDCS, and tRNS. PLoS ONE. 17(7). e0270934–e0270934. 7 indexed citations
4.
Eltiti, Stacy, Denise Wallace, Riccardo Russo, & Elaine Fox. (2018). Symptom Presentation in Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance With Attribution to Electromagnetic Fields: Evidence for a Nocebo Effect Based on Data Re-Analyzed From Two Previous Provocation Studies. Frontiers in Psychology. 9. 1563–1563. 14 indexed citations
5.
Russo, Riccardo, et al.. (2017). When you can, scale up: Large-scale study shows no effect of tDCS in an ambiguous risk-taking task. Neuropsychologia. 104. 133–143. 15 indexed citations
6.
Wallace, Denise, Nicholas R. Cooper, Silke Paulmann, Paul B. Fitzgerald, & Riccardo Russo. (2016). Perceived Comfort and Blinding Efficacy in Randomised Sham-Controlled Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) Trials at 2 mA in Young and Older Healthy Adults. PLoS ONE. 11(2). e0149703–e0149703. 62 indexed citations
7.
Eltiti, Stacy, Denise Wallace, Riccardo Russo, & Elaine Fox. (2015). Aggregated data from two double‐blind base station provocation studies comparing individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance with attribution to electromagnetic fields and controls. Bioelectromagnetics. 36(2). 96–107. 15 indexed citations
8.
Wallace, Denise. (2014). Human Rights and Business. 1 indexed citations
9.
Russo, Riccardo, Denise Wallace, Paul B. Fitzgerald, & Nicholas R. Cooper. (2013). Perception of Comfort During Active and Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Double Blind Study. Brain stimulation. 6(6). 946–951. 67 indexed citations
10.
Wallace, Denise, Stacy Eltiti, Anna Ridgewell, et al.. (2011). Cognitive and physiological responses in humans exposed to a TETRA base station signal in relation to perceived electromagnetic hypersensitivity. Bioelectromagnetics. 33(1). 23–39. 23 indexed citations
11.
Wallace, Denise, Stacy Eltiti, Anna Ridgewell, et al.. (2010). Do TETRA (Airwave) Base Station Signals Have a Short-Term Impact on Health and Well-Being? A Randomized Double-Blind Provocation Study. Environmental Health Perspectives. 118(6). 735–741. 30 indexed citations
13.
Eltiti, Stacy, Denise Wallace, Anna Ridgewell, Riccardo Russo, & Elaine Fox. (2008). Mobile phone base station: Eltiti et al. respond [4]. Environmental Health Perspectives. 116. 1 indexed citations
14.
Eltiti, Stacy, Denise Wallace, Anna Ridgewell, Riccardo Russo, & Elaine Fox. (2008). Mobile Phone Base Stations: Eltiti et al. Respond. Environmental Health Perspectives. 116(2). 4 indexed citations
15.
Eltiti, Stacy, Denise Wallace, Anna Ridgewell, et al.. (2007). Does Short-Term Exposure to Mobile Phone Base Station Signals Increase Symptoms in Individuals Who Report Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields? A Double-Blind Randomized Provocation Study. Environmental Health Perspectives. 115(11). 1603–1608. 97 indexed citations
16.
Eltiti, Stacy, Denise Wallace, Konstantina Zougkou, et al.. (2006). Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire. Bioelectromagnetics. 28(2). 137–151. 82 indexed citations
17.
Eltiti, Stacy, Denise Wallace, & Elaine Fox. (2005). Selective target processing: Perceptual load or distractor salience?. Perception & Psychophysics. 67(5). 876–885. 70 indexed citations
18.
Leark, Robert A., Denise Wallace, & Robert L. Fitzgerald. (2004). Test-Retest Reliability and Standard Error of Measurement for the Test of Variables of Attention (T.O.V.A.) With Healthy School-Age Children. Assessment. 11(4). 285–289. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026