Denise Syndercombe‐Court
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 5%
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis top 5%
- Hematology top 10%
- Physiology
- Co-authors
- Peter M. SchneiderNiels MorlingÃngel CarracedoClaus BørstingChristopher PhillipsMagdalena BogusJuan José Martínez SánchezE. Musgrave-Brown
- Topics
- Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers)Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (6 papers)Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainGermany
In The Last Decade
Denise Syndercombe‐Court
31 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Molecular Biology 540
- Genetics 472
- Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 172
- Hematology 141
- Physiology 133
Countries citing papers authored by Denise Syndercombe‐Court
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Syndercombe‐Court's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Syndercombe‐Court with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Syndercombe‐Court more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Syndercombe‐Court
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Syndercombe‐Court. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Syndercombe‐Court. The network helps show where Denise Syndercombe‐Court may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise Syndercombe‐Court
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise Syndercombe‐Court. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise Syndercombe‐Court based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise Syndercombe‐Court. Denise Syndercombe‐Court is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 44 | |
| 2 | Making sense of forensic genetics. What can DNA tell you about a crime | 2 |
| 3 | 50 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 16 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 370 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 65 | |
| 12 | 81 | |
| 13 | 23 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 29 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Angiographic restenosis after angioplasty: comparison of definitions and correlation with clinical outcome. | 6 |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Denise Syndercombe‐Court
Denise Syndercombe‐Court is a scholar working on Genetics, Hematology and Genetics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (6 papers) and Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (472 citations), Hematology (141 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (172 citations). Denise Syndercombe‐Court has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Schneider, Niels Morling, Ãngel Carracedo, Claus Børsting, Christopher Phillips, Magdalena Bogus, Juan José Martínez Sánchez, E. Musgrave-Brown, C. Harrison and Antonio Salas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.