Denise Syndercombe‐Court

2.4k citations
32 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 17

Denise Syndercombe‐Court

31 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Denise Syndercombe‐Court
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
  • Genetics 472
  • Hematology 141
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 172
  • Molecular Biology 540
  • Internal Medicine 29
Replace H. Déchaud with:
H. Déchaud France
Hidekazu Saito Japan
Bülent Urman Türkiye
Siegfried Rotmensch United States
Michael E. Cunningham United States
Tae Ki Yoon South Korea
Itsuko Furuta Japan
Nobuhiro Suzumori Japan
E. Bottini Italy
Sascha Drewlo United States
Denise Syndercombe‐Court relative to H. Déchaud France H. Déchaud's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
H. Déchaud · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Syndercombe‐Court

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Syndercombe‐Court's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Syndercombe‐Court with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Syndercombe‐Court more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Syndercombe‐Court

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Syndercombe‐Court. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Syndercombe‐Court. The network helps show where Denise Syndercombe‐Court may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Syndercombe‐Court, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise Syndercombe‐Court Line = papers co-authored together Denise Syndercombe‐Court links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202144
2
Making sense of forensic genetics. What can DNA tell you about a crime
20172
3 201550
4 201525
5 201510
6 201416
7 200726
8 2006370
9 200613
10 20069
11 200565
12 200581
13 200223
14 199926
15 199831
16 199529
17 19941
18
Angiographic restenosis after angioplasty: comparison of definitions and correlation with clinical outcome.
19936
19 19924
20 19925

About Denise Syndercombe‐Court

Denise Syndercombe‐Court is a scholar working on Genetics, Hematology and Genetics, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (6 papers), Genetic diversity and population structure (5 papers), Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research (4 papers), Blood properties and coagulation (2 papers), bioluminescence and chemiluminescence research (2 papers), Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (2 papers) and Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (472 citations), Hematology (141 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (172 citations). Denise Syndercombe‐Court has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Peter M. Schneider, Niels Morling, Ángel Carracedo, Claus Børsting, Christopher Phillips, Magdalena Bogus, Juan José Martínez Sánchez, E. Musgrave-Brown, C. Harrison and Antonio Salas. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Blood and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026