Denise M. Mota
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Urology top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Rheumatology
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Aluísio J. D. BarrosIná S. SantosAlícia MatijasevichCésar G. VictoraPedro C. HallalFernando C. BarrosAna Maria B. MenezesElaine Albernaz
- Topics
- Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (8 papers)Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (6 papers)Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (5 papers)
- Cited by
- UrologyPharmacyGastroenterology
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Journal of PediatricsJournal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition
- Partner nations
- BrazilUnited KingdomOman
In The Last Decade
Denise M. Mota
23 papers receiving 370 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 156
- Urology 111
- Epidemiology 90
- Rheumatology 74
- Pharmacy 57
Countries citing papers authored by Denise M. Mota
This map shows the geographic impact of Denise M. Mota's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise M. Mota with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise M. Mota more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Denise M. Mota
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise M. Mota. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise M. Mota. The network helps show where Denise M. Mota may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise M. Mota
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise M. Mota. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise M. Mota based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise M. Mota. Denise M. Mota is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 28 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 35 | |
| 11 | 70 | |
| 12 | 23 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 32 |
About Denise M. Mota
Denise M. Mota is a scholar working on Urology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Gastroenterology, having authored 25 papers that have together received 391 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (8 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (6 papers) and Pediatric Urology and Nephrology Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urology (111 citations), Pharmacy (57 citations) and Gastroenterology (47 citations). Denise M. Mota has collaborated with scholars based in Brazil, United Kingdom and Oman. Frequent co-authors include Aluísio J. D. Barros, Iná S. Santos, Alícia Matijasevich, César G. Victora, Pedro C. Hallal, Fernando C. Barros, Ana Maria B. Menezes, Elaine Albernaz, Samuel Carvalho Dumith and F. Puglia. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Pediatrics and Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.