Sandra Morano

683 total citations
26 papers, 392 citations indexed

About

Sandra Morano is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Rheumatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sandra Morano has authored 26 papers receiving a total of 392 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 12 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 9 papers in Rheumatology. Recurrent topics in Sandra Morano's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (17 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (9 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (9 papers). Sandra Morano is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (17 papers), Maternal and fetal healthcare (9 papers) and Pelvic floor disorders treatments (9 papers). Sandra Morano collaborates with scholars based in Italy, Ireland and Sweden. Sandra Morano's co-authors include Cecily Begley, Emanuela Mistrangelo, Mechthild M. Groß, Susanne Grylka‐Baeschlin, Jane Nicoletti, Patricia Healy, Joan Lalor, S. Costantini, Davide Lijoi and Ingela Lundgren and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.

In The Last Decade

Sandra Morano

26 papers receiving 374 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sandra Morano Italy 13 244 182 160 92 51 26 392
Darren McKay Canada 8 324 1.3× 263 1.4× 177 1.1× 127 1.4× 89 1.7× 10 521
Li Thies‐Lagergren Sweden 11 233 1.0× 126 0.7× 153 1.0× 73 0.8× 55 1.1× 34 354
Charlotte Elvander Sweden 8 257 1.1× 164 0.9× 155 1.0× 78 0.8× 44 0.9× 15 323
Katarina Tunón Sweden 11 254 1.0× 311 1.7× 105 0.7× 62 0.7× 79 1.5× 16 458
Mattea Romano Italy 8 84 0.3× 69 0.4× 203 1.3× 51 0.6× 42 0.8× 10 361
Sergio Martínez‐Vázquez Spain 10 181 0.7× 66 0.4× 143 0.9× 73 0.8× 43 0.8× 28 338
Annemarie Lawrence Australia 4 292 1.2× 195 1.1× 133 0.8× 55 0.6× 66 1.3× 6 371
Flora María Barbosa da Silva Brazil 12 202 0.8× 166 0.9× 117 0.7× 70 0.8× 76 1.5× 21 369
Irene Walton United Kingdom 7 217 0.9× 89 0.5× 170 1.1× 213 2.3× 136 2.7× 11 424
Natalie V. Scime Canada 11 74 0.3× 105 0.6× 126 0.8× 45 0.5× 33 0.6× 58 350

Countries citing papers authored by Sandra Morano

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sandra Morano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sandra Morano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sandra Morano more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sandra Morano

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sandra Morano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sandra Morano. The network helps show where Sandra Morano may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sandra Morano

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sandra Morano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sandra Morano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sandra Morano. Sandra Morano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Calleja‐Agius, Jean, et al.. (2023). Changing birthplaces to care for healthcare workers, lessons from the pandemic: A scoping review. Open Research Europe. 3. 7–7. 1 indexed citations
3.
Daly, Déirdre, Ellen Blix, Anne Britt Vika Nilsen, et al.. (2020). How much synthetic oxytocin is infused during labour? A review and analysis of regimens used in 12 countries. PLoS ONE. 15(7). e0227941–e0227941. 28 indexed citations
4.
Lundgren, Ingela, Sandra Morano, Christina Nilsson, Marlene Sinclair, & Cecily Begley. (2019). Cultural perspectives on vaginal birth after previous caesarean section in countries with high and low rates — A hermeneutic study. Women and Birth. 33(4). e339–e347. 19 indexed citations
5.
Fobelets, Maaike, Katrien Beeckman, Ronald Buyl, et al.. (2019). Preference of birth mode and postnatal health related quality of life after one previous caesarean section in three European countries. Midwifery. 79. 102536–102536. 8 indexed citations
6.
Grylka‐Baeschlin, Susanne, Mike Clarke, Cecily Begley, et al.. (2019). Labour characteristics of women achieving successful vaginal birth after caesarean section in three European countries. Midwifery. 74. 36–43. 7 indexed citations
7.
Hadjigeorgiou, Eleni, Andria Spyridou, Sandra Morano, et al.. (2018). Variation in caesarean section rates in Cyprus, Italy and Iceland: an analysis of the role of the media. PubMed. 70(6). 676–686. 12 indexed citations
8.
Morano, Sandra, et al.. (2018). Humanities in the undergraduate medical and midwifery curriculum: a descriptive Italian comparative study. PubMed. 70(6). 700–709. 2 indexed citations
9.
Setola, Nicoletta, et al.. (2018). Optimal settings for childbirth. PubMed. 70(6). 687–699. 7 indexed citations
10.
Healy, Patricia, Valerie Smith, Mike Clarke, et al.. (2018). Process evaluation for OptiBIRTH, a randomised controlled trial of a complex intervention designed to increase rates of vaginal birth after caesarean section. Trials. 19(1). 9–9. 10 indexed citations
11.
Clausen, Jette Aaroe, Dolores Ruiz‐Berdún, Patricia Gillen, et al.. (2018). Optimal outcomes and women's positive pregnancy experience: a comparison between the World Health Organization guideline and recommendations in European national antenatal care guidelines. PubMed. 70(6). 650–662. 6 indexed citations
12.
Skoko, Elena, Claudia Ravaldi, Alfredo Vannacci, et al.. (2018). Findings from the Italian Babies Born Better Survey. PubMed. 70(6). 663–675. 14 indexed citations
13.
Nilsson, Christina, Joan Lalor, Cecily Begley, et al.. (2017). Vaginal birth after caesarean: Views of women from countries with low VBAC rates. Women and Birth. 30(6). 481–490. 32 indexed citations
14.
Lundgren, Ingela, Patricia Healy, Margaret Carroll, et al.. (2016). Clinicians’ views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section): a study from countries with low VBAC rates. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 16(1). 350–350. 54 indexed citations
15.
16.
Mistrangelo, Emanuela, et al.. (2007). Does water delivery affect pelvic floor? Ultrasound evaluation of perineal function. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 276(2). 133–138. 2 indexed citations
17.
Morano, Sandra, et al.. (2007). Outcomes of the first midwife-led birth centre in Italy: 5 years’ experience. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 276(4). 333–337. 13 indexed citations
18.
Morano, Sandra, et al.. (2006). A randomized comparison of suturing techniques for episiotomy and laceration repair after spontaneous vaginal birth. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. 13(5). 457–462. 39 indexed citations
19.
Lijoi, Davide, Simone Ferrero, Emanuela Mistrangelo, et al.. (2006). The efficacy of 2002 CDC guidelines in preventing perinatal group B Streptococcal vertical transmission: a prospective study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 275(5). 373–379. 17 indexed citations
20.
Costantini, S., Francesca Esposito, Davide Lijoi, et al.. (2005). Ultrasound imaging of the female perineum: the effect of vaginal delivery on pelvic floor dynamics. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 27(2). 183–187. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Darren McKay Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Li Thies‐Lagergren Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Charlotte Elvander Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katarina Tunón Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mattea Romano Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sergio Martínez‐Vázquez Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Annemarie Lawrence Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Flora María Barbosa da Silva Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Irene Walton Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Natalie V. Scime
Rankless by CCL
2026