Denise Cunningham

1.4k citations
34 papers · 619 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Denise Cunningham

30 papers receiving 605 citations

Peers

Denise Cunningham
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
  • Ophthalmology 482
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 198
  • Aging 6
  • Molecular Biology 222
  • Biochemistry 16
Replace Zhenyu Dong with:
Zhenyu Dong Japan
Elizabeth McElnea Ireland
Abdullah S. Al-Kharashi Saudi Arabia
Dominiek D. G. Despriet Netherlands
Jane-Ming Lin Taiwan
Angela J. Cree United Kingdom
Mingwei Zhao China
Javier Cáceres‐del‐Carpio United States
Deepika Malik United States
Dženita Smailhodzic Netherlands
Denise Cunningham relative to Zhenyu Dong Japan Zhenyu Dong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Zhenyu Dong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise Cunningham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise Cunningham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise Cunningham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise Cunningham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise Cunningham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise Cunningham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise Cunningham. The network helps show where Denise Cunningham may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise Cunningham, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise Cunningham Line = papers co-authored together Denise Cunningham links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201096
2 200969
3 201360
4 201457
5 201057
6 201350
7 201637
8 201326
9 199624
10 198423
11 201917
12 199517
13
An image-processing program for automated counting
199612
14 199411
15 201010
16 20208
17 20248
18 20155
19 20034
20 20124

About Denise Cunningham

Denise Cunningham is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Molecular Biology, Neurology and Cell Biology, having authored 34 papers that have together received 619 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (16 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (11 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (7 papers), Retinal Development and Disorders (6 papers), melanin and skin pigmentation (5 papers), Ocular Diseases and Behçet’s Syndrome (4 papers), Retinal and Optic Conditions (3 papers) and Disaster Response and Management (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (482 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (198 citations), Aging (6 citations), Molecular Biology (222 citations) and Biochemistry (16 citations). Denise Cunningham has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include Wai T. Wong, Emily Y. Chew, Catherine A. Cukras, Frederick L. Ferris, Molly Harrington, Keri Hammel, Farzin Forooghian, H. Nida Sen, Robert B. Nussenblatt and Robert F. Bonner. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Retina, Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact