Denise C. Smith

20 papers receiving 325 citations

Peers

Denise C. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 127
  • Research and Theory 4
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 4
  • Health Information Management 14
  • General Health Professions 66
Replace Soheila Mohamadirizi with:
Soheila Mohamadirizi Iran
Allison Cummins Australia
Sally Pairman Australia
Amy M. Romano United States
Ulrika Byrskog Sweden
Mary McCauley United Kingdom
Hannah Rayment‐Jones United Kingdom
Khadijeh Hajimiri Iran
Elysângela Dittz Duarte Brazil
Mahboobeh Khorsandi Iran
Denise C. Smith relative to Soheila Mohamadirizi Iran Soheila Mohamadirizi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.5×
Soheila Mohamadirizi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denise C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise C. Smith. The network helps show where Denise C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denise C. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denise C. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Denise C. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197661
2 201443
3 201842
4 202138
5 201833
6 201022
7 201919
8 201918
9 201016
10 202315
11 201612
12 202111
13 20215
14 20234
15 20243
16 20062
17 20231
18 20211
19
Gestational diabetes in West Virginia.
20141
20 20251

About Denise C. Smith

Denise C. Smith is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Speech and Hearing and Epidemiology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers), Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Breastfeeding Practices and Influences (2 papers), School Health and Nursing Education (2 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Occupational Health and Performance (1 paper) and Gestational Diabetes Research and Management (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (127 citations), Research and Theory (4 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (4 citations), Health Information Management (14 citations) and General Health Professions (66 citations). Denise C. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include G. A. Neligan, Daniele Poole, Nancy K. Lowe, Rachel Blankstein Breman, Ellen L. Tilden, Julia C. Phillippi, Nicole S. Carlson, Jeremy L. Neal, Mary S. Dietrich and Ginger Breedlove. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health, Birth, Women s Health Issues, Policy Politics & Nursing Practice and The Journal of Perinatal & Neonatal Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact