Denise C. Smith

468 total citations
22 papers, 346 citations indexed

About

Denise C. Smith is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Denise C. Smith has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 346 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in General Health Professions, 8 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 6 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Denise C. Smith's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). Denise C. Smith is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (7 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers) and Maternal and fetal healthcare (3 papers). Denise C. Smith collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Denise C. Smith's co-authors include G. A. Neligan, Daniele Poole, Nancy K. Lowe, Rachel Blankstein Breman, Julia C. Phillippi, Ellen L. Tilden, Jeremy L. Neal, Nicole S. Carlson, Mary S. Dietrich and Allison Squires and has published in prestigious journals such as Obstetrics and Gynecology, Health Services Research and Frontiers in Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Denise C. Smith

20 papers receiving 319 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Denise C. Smith United States 12 149 113 111 93 62 22 346
Donna J. Petersen United States 13 122 0.8× 252 2.2× 164 1.5× 123 1.3× 47 0.8× 40 519
Rhona O’Connell Ireland 10 135 0.9× 121 1.1× 109 1.0× 80 0.9× 16 0.3× 27 362
Yoko Shimpuku Japan 12 105 0.7× 136 1.2× 170 1.5× 81 0.9× 33 0.5× 58 388
Mary McCauley United Kingdom 13 194 1.3× 85 0.8× 190 1.7× 149 1.6× 48 0.8× 26 464
Susanna Rance United Kingdom 13 305 2.0× 194 1.7× 291 2.6× 93 1.0× 43 0.7× 22 532
Khadijeh Hajimiri Iran 7 70 0.5× 123 1.1× 79 0.7× 56 0.6× 21 0.3× 17 284
Janna Skagerström Sweden 11 187 1.3× 311 2.8× 272 2.5× 98 1.1× 133 2.1× 31 556
Inge C. Boesveld Netherlands 9 85 0.6× 249 2.2× 81 0.7× 82 0.9× 104 1.7× 15 388
J Rosser United Kingdom 8 76 0.5× 121 1.1× 152 1.4× 79 0.8× 64 1.0× 19 341
Vida Nyagre Yakong Ghana 9 48 0.3× 87 0.8× 129 1.2× 52 0.6× 44 0.7× 40 328

Countries citing papers authored by Denise C. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denise C. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denise C. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denise C. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denise C. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denise C. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denise C. Smith. The network helps show where Denise C. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denise C. Smith

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denise C. Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denise C. Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denise C. Smith. Denise C. Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Anderson, Jessica, et al.. (2025). Birth Outcomes for Obstetrician‐ or Midwife‐Led Intrapartum Care. Birth. 53(1). 181–191. 1 indexed citations
2.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (2025). Respectful maternity care experiences of South Asian refugees in the US: a qualitative study. Frontiers in Public Health. 13. 1613249–1613249.
4.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (2023). Sudden Shift to Telehealth in COVID‐19: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Disparities in Use of Telehealth for Prenatal Care in a Large Midwifery Service. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 69(4). 522–530. 5 indexed citations
5.
Smith, Denise C., Jessica Anderson, Rachel L. Johnson, et al.. (2023). Perinatal Telehealth: Meeting Patients Where They Are. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 69(1). 9–16. 14 indexed citations
6.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (2023). Contemporary Nurse-Midwifery Care in Colorado: A Survey of Certified Nurse-Midwife Practices in Hospital and Community Settings. Policy Politics & Nursing Practice. 24(2). 102–109. 1 indexed citations
7.
Iobst, Stacey E., et al.. (2022). Promoting Military Women’s Health Through Research Design. Military Medicine. 188(3-4). 71–76.
8.
Trego, Lori L., et al.. (2021). A Scoping Review of Breastfeeding in Active Duty U.S. Military Women. Women s Health Issues. 31. S93–S103. 5 indexed citations
9.
Iobst, Stacey E., et al.. (2021). A Scoping Review of Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Postpartum Period in Active Duty U.S. Military Women. Women s Health Issues. 31. S81–S92. 11 indexed citations
10.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (2021). Burnout of the US midwifery workforce and the role of practice environment. Health Services Research. 57(2). 351–363. 37 indexed citations
11.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (2021). Psychometric Evaluation of the Collaborative Practice Scale in Certified Nurse-Midwife and Obstetrician Teams. Journal of Nursing Measurement. 30(4). 748–761. 1 indexed citations
12.
Smith, Denise C., Julia C. Phillippi, Nancy K. Lowe, et al.. (2019). Using the Robson 10‐Group Classification System to Compare Cesarean Birth Utilization Between US Centers With and Without Midwives. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 65(1). 10–21. 18 indexed citations
13.
Jones, J. K. N., et al.. (2019). The experiences of midwives in integrated maternity care: A qualitative metasynthesis. Midwifery. 80. 102544–102544. 18 indexed citations
14.
Neal, Jeremy L., Nicole S. Carlson, Julia C. Phillippi, et al.. (2018). Midwifery presence in United States medical centers and labor care and birth outcomes among low‐risk nulliparous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study. Birth. 46(3). 475–486. 42 indexed citations
15.
Carlson, Nicole S., Jeremy L. Neal, Ellen L. Tilden, et al.. (2018). Influence of midwifery presence in United States centers on labor care and outcomes of low‐risk parous women: A Consortium on Safe Labor study. Birth. 46(3). 487–499. 33 indexed citations
16.
Smith, Denise C.. (2014). Midwife–Physician Collaboration: A Conceptual Framework for Interprofessional Collaborative Practice. Journal of Midwifery & Women s Health. 60(2). 128–139. 43 indexed citations
17.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (2014). Gestational diabetes in West Virginia.. PubMed. 110(3). 36–36. 1 indexed citations
18.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (2010). Nursing Satisfaction and Attitudes With Computerized Software Implementation. CIN Computers Informatics Nursing. 29(4). 245–250. 22 indexed citations
19.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (2010). Effects of Deployment on Depression Screening Scores in Pregnancy at an Army Military Treatment Facility. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 116(3). 679–684. 16 indexed citations
20.
Smith, Denise C., et al.. (1976). Further decline of breast-feeding.. BMJ. 1(6005). 305–307. 62 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026