Denis Schweizer

638 total citations
46 papers, 364 citations indexed

About

Denis Schweizer is a scholar working on Accounting, Finance and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Denis Schweizer has authored 46 papers receiving a total of 364 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Accounting, 19 papers in Finance and 18 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Denis Schweizer's work include Corporate Finance and Governance (21 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (15 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (12 papers). Denis Schweizer is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Finance and Governance (21 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (15 papers) and Financial Markets and Investment Strategies (12 papers). Denis Schweizer collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Germany and United States. Denis Schweizer's co-authors include Lars Helge Haß, Jean‐Michel Sahut, Sofia Johan, Rebel A. Cole, Douglas J. Cumming, Christian Koziol, Brahim Gaies, Mohamed Sahbi Nakhli, Marta Peris‐Ortiz and Bernd Rudolph and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Small Business Economics and Journal of Corporate Finance.

In The Last Decade

Denis Schweizer

42 papers receiving 346 citations

Peers

Denis Schweizer
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Economics and Econometrics 184
  • Finance 130
  • Accounting 113
  • Information Systems 65
  • Strategy and Management 45
Replace Jéssica Paule-Vianez with:
Jéssica Paule-Vianez Spain
Binam Ghimire United Kingdom
Hazem Marashdeh United Arab Emirates
Mingzhe Yu China
Apostolos G. Christopoulos Greece
Samit Paul India
Yan Ji United States
Tao Kong China
Suha Mahmoud Alawi Saudi Arabia
Monica Rossolini Italy
Jéssica Paule-Vianez Spain View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Denis Schweizer
Denis Schweizer · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Denis Schweizer
Denis Schweizer · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Denis Schweizer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Schweizer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Schweizer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Schweizer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Schweizer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Schweizer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Schweizer. The network helps show where Denis Schweizer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis Schweizer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis Schweizer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis Schweizer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis Schweizer. Denis Schweizer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 1
4 20
5 1
6 6
7 24
8 6
9 8
10 1
11 21
12 2
13 1
14 3
15
Hedge Funds versus Private Equity Funds as Shareholder Activists in Germany – Differences in Value Creation
4
16 2
17 2
18 13
19 5
20 8

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026