Denis Đermadi

987 citations
16 papers · 626 · h-index 9

Impact in

    • Lymphatic System and Diseases
    • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
    • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
    • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
    • Immune Cell Function and Interaction

Papers in

Denis Đermadi

16 papers receiving 621 citations

Peers

Denis Đermadi
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • Oncology 223
  • Immunology 171
  • Cancer Research 65
  • Molecular Biology 249
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 59
Replace Kayla A. Martin with:
Kayla A. Martin United States
Esther Mellado-Gomez United Kingdom
Sumihito Togi Japan
Joseph Burclaff United States
Davide Mangani United States
Jia Nie United States
Tatsuro Murano Japan
Jan Kempski Germany
Wonyong Lee South Korea
Denis Đermadi relative to Kayla A. Martin United States Kayla A. Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Kayla A. Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denis Đermadi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Đermadi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Đermadi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Đermadi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Đermadi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Đermadi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Đermadi. The network helps show where Denis Đermadi may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denis Đermadi, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denis Đermadi Line = papers co-authored together Denis Đermadi links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2019147
2 2020112
3 202090
4 201771
5 202148
6 200845
7 202245
8 202014
9 202212
10 20228
11 20238
12 20087
13 20137
14 20145
15 20205
16 20222

About Denis Đermadi

Denis Đermadi is a scholar working on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Immunology, Oncology, Molecular Biology and Cancer Research, having authored 16 papers that have together received 626 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Genetic factors in colorectal cancer (5 papers), Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics (5 papers), Digestive system and related health (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (2 papers), RNA modifications and cancer (2 papers), COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies (2 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers) and Lymphatic System and Diseases (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Oncology (223 citations), Immunology (171 citations), Cancer Research (65 citations), Molecular Biology (249 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (59 citations). Denis Đermadi has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Finland and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Eugene C. Butcher, Kevin Brulois, Junliang Pan, Minna Nyström, Saara Ollila, Sirpa Jalkanen, Akira Takeda, Sofia Nordling, Josef Jiricny and Ilkka Koskivuo. Their work appears in journals such as iScience, Immunity, PLoS ONE, Science and Cancer Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact