Denis Charlebois

611 total citations
24 papers, 426 citations indexed

About

Denis Charlebois is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Biochemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, Denis Charlebois has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 426 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Plant Science, 7 papers in Molecular Biology and 7 papers in Biochemistry. Recurrent topics in Denis Charlebois's work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (7 papers), Berry genetics and cultivation research (6 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (6 papers). Denis Charlebois is often cited by papers focused on Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (7 papers), Berry genetics and cultivation research (6 papers) and Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms (6 papers). Denis Charlebois collaborates with scholars based in Canada, China and United States. Denis Charlebois's co-authors include John A. Berges, David C. Mauzerall, Paul G. Falkowski, Marie Thérèse Charles, Roger M. Leblanc, Dominique Roussel, K. Veeranjaneyulu, Daniel Rolland, Shahrokh Khanizadeh and D. Mauzerall and has published in prestigious journals such as PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, Environmental Pollution and Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics.

In The Last Decade

Denis Charlebois

24 papers receiving 406 citations

Peers

Denis Charlebois
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Plant Science 177
  • Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment 122
  • Molecular Biology 119
  • Oceanography 117
  • Ecology 60
Replace Vesa Havurinne with:
Vesa Havurinne Finland
Arthur M. Nonomura United States
Katsuhiko Okada Japan
Adele Post Australia
Gabriel P. Holbrook United States
Kittisak Yokthongwattana Thailand
Alberto A. Esteves‐Ferreira Brazil
Julie Soukupová Czechia
Norma L. Kerber Argentina
Eitan Salomon Israel
Vesa Havurinne Finland View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Denis Charlebois
Denis Charlebois · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Denis Charlebois
Denis Charlebois · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Denis Charlebois

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denis Charlebois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denis Charlebois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denis Charlebois more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denis Charlebois

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denis Charlebois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denis Charlebois. The network helps show where Denis Charlebois may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Denis Charlebois

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Denis Charlebois. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Denis Charlebois based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Denis Charlebois. Denis Charlebois is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 23
2 27
3 8
4 3
5 1
6 3
7 34
8 4
9 2
10
Elderberry as a Medicinal Plant
18
11 13
12 3
13 211
14 7
15 5
16 1
17 10
18 10
19 16
20 8

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026