Denae W. King

690 citations
21 papers · 473 indexed · h-index 10

Denae W. King

19 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Denae W. King
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 58
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 13
  • General Health Professions 114
  • Clinical Psychology 89
  • Family Practice 7
Replace Anneke Blokstra with:
Anneke Blokstra Netherlands
Rebecca Fisher United Kingdom
Jasmine Mah Canada
Camilla B. Pimentel United States
Cheryl Craigs United Kingdom
Ruoxi Ding China
Angela Laffan United States
Mathieu Oriol France
Anne Gilsing Canada
Wei‐Min Chu Taiwan
Denae W. King relative to Anneke Blokstra Netherlands Anneke Blokstra's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Anneke Blokstra · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Denae W. King

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Denae W. King's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Denae W. King with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Denae W. King more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Denae W. King

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Denae W. King. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Denae W. King. The network helps show where Denae W. King may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Denae W. King, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Denae W. King Line = papers co-authored together Denae W. King links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201519
2
Disseminating Health Disparities Education Through Tele-learning
20150
3
VIVENDO NA LINHA DE FRENTE DA LUTA AMBIENTAL: LIÇÕES DAS COMUNIDADES MAIS VULNERÁVEIS DOS ESTADOS UNIDOS
20141
4
LIVING ON THE FRONTLINE OF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSAULT: LESSONS FROM THE UNITED STATES MOST VULERABLE COMMUNITIES
20140
5 201319
6 201018
7 2010234
8 20091
9 200912
10 20093
11 200938
12 20088
13 20072
14 20071
15 20064
16 200610
17 200011
18 199927
19 199761
20
Diseases associated with aging.
19832

About Denae W. King

Denae W. King is a scholar working on Chemical Health and Safety, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Environmental Justice and Health Disparities (4 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (3 papers), Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations (3 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (2 papers), Ethics in Clinical Research (2 papers), Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout (2 papers) and Cultural Competency in Health Care (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (58 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (13 citations) and General Health Professions (114 citations). Denae W. King has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Shedra Amy Snipes, Angelica P. Herrera, Isabel Torres‐Vigil, Daniel S. Goldberg, Armin D. Weinberg, Lynda A. King, Brett T. Litz, Matthew J. Friedman, Susan M. Orsillo and Lovell A. Jones. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026