Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Pain as a global public health priority
2011974 citationsDaniel S. Goldberg, Summer McGeeBMC Public Healthprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel S. Goldberg
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel S. Goldberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel S. Goldberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel S. Goldberg more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel S. Goldberg
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel S. Goldberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel S. Goldberg. The network helps show where Daniel S. Goldberg may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel S. Goldberg
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel S. Goldberg.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel S. Goldberg based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel S. Goldberg. Daniel S. Goldberg is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2013). Intervening at the Right Point in the Causal Pathways: Law, Policy, and the Devastating Impact of Pain Across the Globe. eYLS (Yale Law School). 22(2). 198.1 indexed citations
6.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2013). The Errors of Individualistic Public Health Interventions: Denial of Treatment to Obese Persons; Comment on 'Denial of Treatment to Obese Patients — The Wrong Policy on Personal Responsibility for Health'. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
Goldberg, Daniel S. & Summer McGee. (2011). Pain as a global public health priority. BMC Public Health. 11(1). 770–770.974 indexed citations breakdown →
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2007). Against Genetic Exceptionalism: An Argument in Favor of the Viability of Preconception Genetic Torts. DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library). 10(2). 259.1 indexed citations
14.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2007). The Aches and Pains of Transition to a Consumption Tax: Can We Get There From Here?. SSRN Electronic Journal.
15.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2006). The Ethics of DNR Orders as to Neonatal and Pediatric Patients: The Ethical Dimension of Communication. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
16.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2006). Research Fraud: A Sui Generis Problem Demands a Sui Generis Solution (Plus a Little Due Process). SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
17.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2006). I Do Not Think It Means What You Think It Means: How Kripke and Wittgenstein's Analysis on Rule Following Undermines Justice Scalia's Textualism and Originalism. Cleveland State law review. 54(3). 273.1 indexed citations
18.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2004). The U.S. Consumption Tax: Evolution, Not Revolution. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
19.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2002). Choice of Entity for a Venture Capital Start-Up: The Myth of Incorporation. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
20.
Goldberg, Daniel S.. (2002). And the Walls Came Tumbling Down: How Classical Scientific Fallacies Undermine the Validity of Textualism and Originalism. Houston Law Review. 39(2). 4218.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.