Dena T. Smith

430 citations
5 papers · 192 · h-index 4

Impact in

    • Health disparities and outcomes
    • COVID-19 and Mental Health
    • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
    • Eating Disorders and Behaviors

Papers in

    • Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices 2
    • Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies 1
    • Mental Health and Psychiatry 2

Dena T. Smith

5 papers receiving 189 citations

Peers

Dena T. Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
  • Health 22
  • Clinical Psychology 57
  • Gender Studies 24
  • General Health Professions 41
  • Social Psychology 36
Replace Allison L. Rodriguez with:
Allison L. Rodriguez United States
Izraelle I. McKinnon United States
James Tapp United Kingdom
Eva Brown Hajdukova United Kingdom
Tiffany Jenzer United States
Yewande Oshodi Nigeria
Elizabeth A. Mahar United States
Ashley Hill Australia
Merete Berg Nesset Norway
Gursimran Thandi United Kingdom
Dena T. Smith relative to Allison L. Rodriguez United States Allison L. Rodriguez's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Allison L. Rodriguez · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Dena T. Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dena T. Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dena T. Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dena T. Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dena T. Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dena T. Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dena T. Smith. The network helps show where Dena T. Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 2 scholars most cited alongside Dena T. Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Dena T. Smith Line = papers co-authored together Dena T. Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

5 of 5 papers shown

About Dena T. Smith

Dena T. Smith is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Philosophy, Gender Studies, Social Psychology and General Health Professions, having authored 5 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices (2 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (1 paper), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (1 paper), Sex and Gender in Healthcare (1 paper), Mental Health Treatment and Access (1 paper) and Body Image and Dysmorphia Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Health (22 citations), Clinical Psychology (57 citations), Gender Studies (24 citations), General Health Professions (41 citations) and Social Psychology (36 citations). Dena T. Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Dawne M. Mouzon and Marta Elliott. Their work appears in journals such as Sex Roles, American Journal of Men s Health, Sociology Compass, Society and Mental Health and Rutgers University Community Repository (Rutgers University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact