Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Del Meidinger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Del Meidinger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Del Meidinger more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Del Meidinger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Del Meidinger. The network helps show where Del Meidinger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Del Meidinger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Del Meidinger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Del Meidinger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Del Meidinger. Del Meidinger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Faber‐Langendoen, Don, Todd Keeler‐Wolf, Del Meidinger, et al.. (2012). Classification and description of world formation types. Part II (Description of formation types).1 indexed citations
5.
Campbell, Elizabeth M., Sari C. Saunders, David Coates, et al.. (2009). Ecological resilience and complexity: a theoretical framework for understanding and managing British Columbia's forest ecosystems in a changing climate..30 indexed citations
6.
Meidinger, Del, et al.. (2007). Garry oak (Quercus garryana) plant communities in British Columbia: a guide to identification..6 indexed citations
Douglas, George W., Del Meidinger, & J. Pojar. (2002). Illustrated flora of British Columbia. Volume 8: General summary, maps and keys..2 indexed citations
9.
Douglas, George W., Del Meidinger, & J. Pojar. (2001). Illustrated flora of British Columbia. Volume 7: Monocotyledons (Orchidaceae through Zosteraceae)..3 indexed citations
10.
Douglas, George W., Del Meidinger, & J. Pojar. (2000). Illustrated flora of British Columbia. Volume 5: Dicotyledons (Salicaceae through Zygophyllaceae) and pteridophytes..8 indexed citations
11.
Douglas, George W., Del Meidinger, & J. Pojar. (1999). Illustrated flora of British Columbia. Volume 4: Dicotyledons (Orobanchaceae through Rubiaceae)..3 indexed citations
12.
Douglas, George W., et al.. (1998). Illustrated flora of British Columbia. Volume 1. Gymnosperms and dicotyledons (Aceraceae through Asteraceae)..12 indexed citations
Klinka, Karel, J. Pojar, & Del Meidinger. (1991). Revision of biogeoclimatic units of coastal British Columbia. Northwest Science. 65(1). 32–47.78 indexed citations
18.
Douglas, George W., et al.. (1991). The Vascular Plants of British Columbia Part 3 - Dicotyledons (Primulaceae through Zygophyllaceae) and Pteridophytes.11 indexed citations
19.
Meidinger, Del, et al.. (1990). Describing ecosystems in the field..76 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.