De‐En Hu
Impact in
- Biophysics top 0.2%
- Electron Spin Resonance Studies
- Spectroscopy top 0.2%
- Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Papers in
- Biophysics 12
- Electron Spin Resonance Studies 12
- Spectroscopy 25
- Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications 24
- Co-authors
- Kevin M. BrindleMikko I. KettunenFerdia A. GallagherMathilde H. LercheSam E. DayJan Henrik Ardenkjær‐LarsenKlaes GolmanBrett W. C. Kennedy
- Journals
- Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (9 papers)British Journal of Pharmacology (7 papers)Cancer Research (7 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (4 papers)NMR in Biomedicine (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSouth SudanItaly
In The Last Decade
De‐En Hu
60 papers receiving 4.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 125
- Biophysics 862
- Spectroscopy 2.1k
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 1.7k
- Cancer Research 462
- Materials Chemistry 989
Countries citing papers authored by De‐En Hu
This map shows the geographic impact of De‐En Hu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by De‐En Hu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites De‐En Hu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by De‐En Hu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by De‐En Hu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by De‐En Hu. The network helps show where De‐En Hu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside De‐En Hu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 31 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2015 | 36 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 29 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 226 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 42 | |
| 12 | 2010 | 95 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 94 | |
| 14 | Magnetic resonance imaging of pH in vivo using hyperpolarized 13C-labelled bicarbonate Hit paper breakdown → | 2008 | 704 |
| 15 | 2008 | 63 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 23 | |
| 17 | 2005 | 45 | |
| 18 | 1996 | 56 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 57 | |
| 20 | 1992 | 4 |
About De‐En Hu
De‐En Hu is a scholar working on Biophysics, Spectroscopy, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Genetics and Biochemistry, having authored 60 papers that have together received 4.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced NMR Techniques and Applications (24 papers), Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Electron Spin Resonance Studies (12 papers), Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer (9 papers), Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications (8 papers), Atomic and Subatomic Physics Research (5 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (4 papers) and Solid-state spectroscopy and crystallography (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (862 citations), Spectroscopy (2.1k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (1.7k citations), Cancer Research (462 citations) and Materials Chemistry (989 citations). De‐En Hu has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Sudan and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Kevin M. Brindle, Mikko I. Kettunen, Ferdia A. Gallagher, Mathilde H. Lerche, Sam E. Day, Jan Henrik Ardenkjær‐Larsen, Klaes Golman, Brett W. C. Kennedy, Sarah E. Bohndiek and Magnus Karlsson. Their work appears in journals such as Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, British Journal of Pharmacology, Cancer Research, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and NMR in Biomedicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.