Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Ecology top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Co-authors
- Bernhard SchmidDan F. B. FlynnJana S. PetermannGerlinde B. De DeynVaruna YadavRob W. BrookerChristian SchöbTerhi Hahl
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (6 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers)Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers)
- Cited by
- Nature and Landscape ConservationEcological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
- Journals
- NatureEcologyFunctional Ecology
- Partner nations
- SwitzerlandGermanyUnited States
In The Last Decade
Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley
12 papers receiving 497 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 259
- Plant Science 195
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 190
- Ecology 125
- Global and Planetary Change 91
Countries citing papers authored by Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley
This map shows the geographic impact of Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley. The network helps show where Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley. Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 20 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 28 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 32 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | Selection for niche differentiation in plant communities increases biodiversity effectsbreakdown → | 298 |
| 12 | 33 |
About Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley
Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecological Modeling and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 504 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (6 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (6 papers) and Plant Parasitism and Resistance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (259 citations), Ecological Modeling (60 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (190 citations). Debra Zuppinger‐Dingley has collaborated with scholars based in Switzerland, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bernhard Schmid, Dan F. B. Flynn, Jana S. Petermann, Gerlinde B. De Deyn, Varuna Yadav, Rob W. Brooker, Christian Schöb, Terhi Hahl, Sofia J. van Moorsel and Marc W. Schmid. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Ecology and Functional Ecology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.