Debra L. Bynum
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Oncology
- General Health Professions
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Louise C. WalterHalle R AmickCarmen L. LewisChristine E. KistlerLea C. WatsonMark S. BauerDavid L. DünnerPeter C. Whybrow
- Topics
- Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers)Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAmerican Journal of PsychiatryJournal of the American Geriatrics Society
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Debra L. Bynum
11 papers receiving 254 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Psychiatry and Mental health 120
- Oncology 69
- General Health Professions 45
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 41
- Clinical Psychology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Debra L. Bynum
This map shows the geographic impact of Debra L. Bynum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Debra L. Bynum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Debra L. Bynum more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Debra L. Bynum
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Debra L. Bynum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Debra L. Bynum. The network helps show where Debra L. Bynum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Debra L. Bynum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Debra L. Bynum. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Debra L. Bynum based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Debra L. Bynum. Debra L. Bynum is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | A quality improvement project to reduce the complications associated with indwelling urinary catheters. | 17 |
| 10 | 69 | |
| 11 | 23 | |
| 12 | 123 |
About Debra L. Bynum
Debra L. Bynum is a scholar working on Family Practice, Health Informatics and Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, having authored 12 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (3 papers) and Diversity and Career in Medicine (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (120 citations), Biological Psychiatry (15 citations) and Oncology (69 citations). Debra L. Bynum has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Louise C. Walter, Halle R Amick, Carmen L. Lewis, Christine E. Kistler, Lea C. Watson, Mark S. Bauer, David L. Dünner, Peter C. Whybrow, L. Gyulai and Robert M. Post. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.