Deborah Williams

2.8k total citations
21 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Deborah Williams is a scholar working on Surgery, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Williams has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and 4 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Deborah Williams's work include Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (4 papers). Deborah Williams is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair (4 papers), Heart Failure Treatment and Management (4 papers) and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (4 papers). Deborah Williams collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Deborah Williams's co-authors include Alan Weinberg, Alan J. Moskowitz, Peter A. Shapiro, Daniel J. Goldstein, Mehmet C. Öz, Robert R. Sciacca, Eric A. Rose, Robert E. Michler, Daniel F. Heitjan and Eric A. Rose and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Diabetes Care and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Williams

19 papers receiving 952 citations

Peers

Deborah Williams
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Surgery 599
  • Biomedical Engineering 393
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 365
  • Epidemiology 141
  • Emergency Medicine 133
Replace Maureen Flattery with:
Maureen Flattery United States
Philippe Bizouarn France
William Piccione United States
Camille Legeai France
Joan Carles Trullàs Spain
Francesco Bruno Italy
Mark Ogino United States
Andrea Bottazzi Italy
Axel Heinemann Germany
Thomas V. Brogan United States
Maureen Flattery United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Deborah Williams
Deborah Williams · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Deborah Williams
Deborah Williams · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Williams

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Williams more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Williams

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Williams. The network helps show where Deborah Williams may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Williams

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Williams. Deborah Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 4
3 1
4 13
5 39
6 46
7 0
8 12
9 21
10 4
11 79
12 249
13 44
14 35
15 78
16 70
17 45
18 56
19 161
20 49

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026