Deborah S. Keller

9.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
189 papers, 3.9k citations indexed

About

Deborah S. Keller is a scholar working on Surgery, Oncology and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah S. Keller has authored 189 papers receiving a total of 3.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 126 papers in Surgery, 116 papers in Oncology and 49 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Recurrent topics in Deborah S. Keller's work include Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (99 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (49 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (46 papers). Deborah S. Keller is often cited by papers focused on Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments (99 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (49 papers) and Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (46 papers). Deborah S. Keller collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Deborah S. Keller's co-authors include Conor P. Delaney, Manish Chand, Richard Cohen, Eric M. Haas, Sharon L. Stein, Steven D. Wexner, Scott R. Steele, Mariana Berho, Alastair Windsor and Joep Knol and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Gastroenterology and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

In The Last Decade

Deborah S. Keller

177 papers receiving 3.8k citations

Hit Papers

The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah S. Keller United States 33 2.4k 2.0k 940 597 248 189 3.9k
Eugene F. Foley United States 30 2.0k 0.8× 1.3k 0.6× 677 0.7× 566 0.9× 113 0.5× 60 3.6k
Kenneth R. McQuaid United States 29 2.0k 0.8× 1.3k 0.7× 362 0.4× 1.3k 2.1× 164 0.7× 72 4.2k
Cameron Platell Australia 34 1.6k 0.7× 2.8k 1.4× 361 0.4× 787 1.3× 58 0.2× 149 4.4k
Tanya L. Hoskin United States 47 2.9k 1.2× 1.7k 0.9× 759 0.8× 1.7k 2.8× 419 1.7× 211 7.2k
Reid B. Adams United States 40 3.2k 1.3× 2.1k 1.1× 283 0.3× 2.0k 3.3× 182 0.7× 138 5.4k
Rowan W. Parks United Kingdom 42 5.0k 2.1× 4.6k 2.3× 760 0.8× 2.5k 4.2× 337 1.4× 138 8.4k
Charles P. Heise United States 26 1.3k 0.5× 1.1k 0.5× 285 0.3× 307 0.5× 101 0.4× 61 2.3k
Ivan Cecconello Brazil 37 3.6k 1.5× 1.8k 0.9× 171 0.2× 1.8k 3.0× 177 0.7× 393 6.0k
Robert D. Madoff United States 54 7.0k 3.0× 4.1k 2.0× 281 0.3× 962 1.6× 212 0.9× 182 8.7k
Manish Chand United Kingdom 27 1.4k 0.6× 1.6k 0.8× 165 0.2× 545 0.9× 491 2.0× 104 2.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah S. Keller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah S. Keller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah S. Keller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah S. Keller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah S. Keller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah S. Keller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah S. Keller. The network helps show where Deborah S. Keller may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah S. Keller

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah S. Keller. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah S. Keller based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah S. Keller. Deborah S. Keller is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Keller, Deborah S., John D. Mellinger, Liane S. Feldman, et al.. (2024). A cross sectional survey on burnout and career satisfaction in surgeons: a joint work from the SAGES quality, outcomes, and safety and reimaging the practice of surgery burnout task forces. Surgical Endoscopy. 38(9). 4776–4787. 2 indexed citations
3.
SIBLEY, P. J., Deborah S. Keller, Francesco Pata, et al.. (2024). Genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors in diverticular disease: systematic review. BJS Open. 8(3).
5.
Marks, John H., et al.. (2023). A prospective phase II clinical trial/IDEAL Stage 2a series of single‐port robotic colorectal surgery for abdominal and transanal cases. Colorectal Disease. 25(12). 2335–2345. 14 indexed citations
7.
Keller, Deborah S., Giovanni Dapri, Alexis Grucela, et al.. (2022). The SAGES MASTERS program presents: the 10 seminal articles for the Laparoscopic Right Colectomy Pathway. Surgical Endoscopy. 36(7). 4639–4649.
8.
Rodríguez‐Luna, María Rita, Mahdi Al‐Taher, Deborah S. Keller, et al.. (2022). In Vivo Imaging Evaluation of Fluorescence Intensity at Tail Emission of Near-Infrared-I (NIR-I) Fluorophores in a Porcine Model. Life. 12(8). 1123–1123. 7 indexed citations
10.
Keller, Deborah S., Brooke Kenney, Calista M. Harbaugh, Jennifer F. Waljee, & Chad M. Brummett. (2020). A national evaluation of opioid prescribing and persistent use after ambulatory anorectal surgery. Surgery. 169(4). 759–766. 9 indexed citations
11.
Augestad, Knut Magne, et al.. (2019). Video-based coaching in surgical education: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgical Endoscopy. 34(2). 521–535. 64 indexed citations
12.
Keller, Deborah S., Jianying Zhang, & Manish Chand. (2018). Opioid-free colorectal surgery: a method to improve patient & financial outcomes in surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 33(6). 1959–1966. 26 indexed citations
13.
Jenks, Andrew, Simon Vyse, Eleftherios Kostaras, et al.. (2018). Primary Cilia Mediate Diverse Kinase Inhibitor Resistance Mechanisms in Cancer. Cell Reports. 23(10). 3042–3055. 89 indexed citations
14.
Keller, Deborah S., Donald A. Kroll, Harry T. Papaconstantinou, & Neal C. Ellis. (2017). Development and Validation of a Methodology to Reduce Mortality Using the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program Risk Calculator. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 224(4). 602–607. 5 indexed citations
15.
Keller, Deborah S., et al.. (2016). Impact of long-acting local anesthesia on clinical and financial outcomes in laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The American Journal of Surgery. 214(1). 53–58. 20 indexed citations
16.
Keller, Deborah S., Juan R. Flores‐Gonzalez, Sérgio Ibarra-Espinosa, Ali Mahmood, & Eric M. Haas. (2016). Is there value in alvimopan in minimally invasive colorectal surgery?. The American Journal of Surgery. 212(5). 851–856. 28 indexed citations
17.
Keller, Deborah S. & Eric M. Haas. (2015). Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: State of the Art. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 20(2). 463–469. 23 indexed citations
18.
Keller, Deborah S., et al.. (2015). SILS v SILS+1: a Case-Matched Comparison for Colorectal Surgery. Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery. 19(10). 1875–1879. 11 indexed citations
19.
Keller, Deborah S., et al.. (2015). Evaluating quality across minimally invasive platforms in colorectal surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 30(6). 2207–2216. 5 indexed citations
20.
Keller, Deborah S., Justin K. Lawrence, Tamar Nobel, & Conor P. Delaney. (2013). Optimizing cost and short-term outcomes for elderly patients in laparoscopic colonic surgery. Surgical Endoscopy. 27(12). 4463–4468. 36 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026