Deborah R. McFarlane

29 papers receiving 684 citations

Peers

Deborah R. McFarlane
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • General Health Professions 368
  • Gender Studies 152
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 139
  • Political Science and International Relations 131
  • Sociology and Political Science 127
Replace Claire Maxwell with:
Claire Maxwell United Kingdom
Jennifer Brown United States
Catherine Donovan United States
Melissa K. Miller United States
John Grundy Australia
Ida Susser United States
Nandita Sharma India
Niamh Stephenson Australia
Mark Edwards United States
Michelle Redman‐MacLaren Australia
Deborah R. McFarlane relative to Claire Maxwell United Kingdom Claire Maxwell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Claire Maxwell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah R. McFarlane

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah R. McFarlane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah R. McFarlane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah R. McFarlane more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah R. McFarlane

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah R. McFarlane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah R. McFarlane. The network helps show where Deborah R. McFarlane may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah R. McFarlane

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah R. McFarlane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah R. McFarlane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah R. McFarlane. Deborah R. McFarlane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 4
2 0
3 63
4 8
5 9
6 3
7 62
8 4
9 26
10 44
11 1
12 3
13 2
14
State policies on funding of abortions: a pooled time series analysis.
22
15
Communal water fluoridation in Ontario. 1992 status report.
1
16 23
17
Are block grants more responsive to state health needs? The case of the Federal Family Planning Program (FY 76-81).
1
18 1
19 3
20 52

About Deborah R. McFarlane

Deborah R. McFarlane is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Issues, ethics and legal aspects and General Health Professions, having authored 31 papers that have together received 809 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (10 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers) and Reproductive Health and Contraception (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (152 citations), General Health Professions (368 citations) and Public Administration (42 citations). Deborah R. McFarlane has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth J. Meier, W. J. Hartley, William G. Weissert, Carol S. Weissert, Donald P. Haider‐Markel, Alesha E. Doan, Susan Markens, Beth Baldwin Tigges, Mindy B. Tinkle and Blake Boursaw. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, American Journal of Public Health and Social Science & Medicine.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026