Deborah Koetzle Shaffer
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Jennifer L. HartmanShelley Johnson ListwanEdward J. LatessaTravis C. PrattTerance D. MietheBridget KellyJoel D. LiebermanKristin Bechtel
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers)Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Deborah Koetzle Shaffer
12 papers receiving 309 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Sociology and Political Science 215
- Clinical Psychology 211
- Epidemiology 171
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 57
- General Health Professions 54
Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Koetzle Shaffer
This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Koetzle Shaffer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Koetzle Shaffer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Koetzle Shaffer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Koetzle Shaffer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Koetzle Shaffer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Koetzle Shaffer. The network helps show where Deborah Koetzle Shaffer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Koetzle Shaffer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Koetzle Shaffer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Koetzle Shaffer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Koetzle Shaffer. Deborah Koetzle Shaffer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Facebook and the Police: Communication in the Social Networking Era | 1 |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 152 | |
| 4 | 8 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 9 | |
| 7 | 39 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 24 | |
| 10 | The Efficacy of Drug Courts: Does Gender Matter? | 1 |
| 11 | Reconsidering Drug Court Effectiveness: A Meta-analytic Review | 53 |
| 12 | EVALUATION OF OHIO'S DRUG COURTS: A COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS | 1 |
About Deborah Koetzle Shaffer
Deborah Koetzle Shaffer is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 12 papers that have together received 342 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (5 papers), Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (5 papers) and Opioid Use Disorder Treatment (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (211 citations), Sociology and Political Science (215 citations) and Epidemiology (171 citations). Deborah Koetzle Shaffer has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jennifer L. Hartman, Shelley Johnson Listwan, Edward J. Latessa, Travis C. Pratt, Terance D. Miethe, Bridget Kelly, Joel D. Lieberman and Kristin Bechtel. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, Justice Quarterly and Crime & Delinquency.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.