Deborah Koder

525 total citations
25 papers, 337 citations indexed

About

Deborah Koder is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah Koder has authored 25 papers receiving a total of 337 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, 13 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health and 12 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Deborah Koder's work include Aging and Gerontology Research (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers). Deborah Koder is often cited by papers focused on Aging and Gerontology Research (13 papers), Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (13 papers) and Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (11 papers). Deborah Koder collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Denmark. Deborah Koder's co-authors include Edward Helmes, Henry Brodaty, Kaarin J. Anstey, Tanya E. Davison, Susan J. Ferguson, Nancy A. Pachana, Sunil Bhar, Colleen Doyle, Glenn E. Hunt and Leander K. Mitchell and has published in prestigious journals such as International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, International Psychogeriatrics and Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging.

In The Last Decade

Deborah Koder

25 papers receiving 311 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah Koder Australia 11 157 121 116 83 69 25 337
Jeanine M. Parisi United States 10 109 0.7× 111 0.9× 49 0.4× 78 0.9× 68 1.0× 17 356
Richard A. Hussian United States 9 120 0.8× 36 0.3× 105 0.9× 140 1.7× 65 0.9× 12 374
Natalie Gracia Australia 8 159 1.0× 27 0.2× 186 1.6× 70 0.8× 25 0.4× 9 360
Shirley Hendrix United States 7 134 0.9× 56 0.5× 103 0.9× 169 2.0× 57 0.8× 9 384
Lisa Kirk Wiese United States 11 125 0.8× 20 0.2× 101 0.9× 53 0.6× 38 0.6× 44 318
Pricila Cristina Correa Ribeiro Brazil 11 110 0.7× 50 0.4× 120 1.0× 32 0.4× 24 0.3× 32 329
Jelena Siebert Germany 12 55 0.4× 222 1.8× 32 0.3× 33 0.4× 140 2.0× 18 344
Sue Watts United Kingdom 10 181 1.2× 16 0.1× 192 1.7× 75 0.9× 42 0.6× 12 365
Mary P. Quayhagen United States 8 302 1.9× 37 0.3× 164 1.4× 138 1.7× 34 0.5× 11 458
Annaliese Blair Australia 10 154 1.0× 30 0.2× 158 1.4× 36 0.4× 32 0.5× 19 312

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah Koder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah Koder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah Koder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah Koder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah Koder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah Koder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah Koder. The network helps show where Deborah Koder may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah Koder

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah Koder. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah Koder based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah Koder. Deborah Koder is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Bhar, Sunil, Tanya E. Davison, Penelope Schofield, et al.. (2023). Study protocol for ELders AT Ease (ELATE): a cluster randomised controlled trial of cognitive behaviour therapy to reduce depressive symptoms in aged care residents. BMC Geriatrics. 23(1). 555–555. 1 indexed citations
2.
Koder, Deborah, et al.. (2023). Supervising post-graduate psychology trainees in residential aged care settings: common issues. Australian Psychologist. 59(2). 87–94. 2 indexed citations
3.
Bhar, Sunil, et al.. (2022). Addressing Mental Health in Aged Care Residents. 2(1). 183–191. 1 indexed citations
5.
Bhar, Sunil, Tanya E. Davison, Colleen Doyle, et al.. (2019). Characteristics and effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy for older adults living in residential care: a systematic review. Aging & Mental Health. 25(2). 187–205. 15 indexed citations
6.
Bhar, Sunil, Tanya E. Davison, Colleen Doyle, et al.. (2018). Characteristics of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Older Adults Living in Residential Care: Protocol for a Systematic Review. JMIR Research Protocols. 7(7). e164–e164. 9 indexed citations
7.
Davison, Tanya E., Deborah Koder, Edward Helmes, et al.. (2016). Brief on the Role of Psychologists in Residential and Home Care Services for Older Adults. Australian Psychologist. 52(6). 397–405. 19 indexed citations
8.
Bhar, Sunil, Tanya E. Davison, Nancy A. Pachana, et al.. (2016). The Availability of Psychological Services for Aged Care Residents in Australia: A Survey of Facility Staff. Australian Psychologist. 52(6). 406–413. 26 indexed citations
9.
Koder, Deborah, Glenn E. Hunt, & Tanya E. Davison. (2014). Staff’s views on managing symptoms of dementia in nursing home residents. Nursing Older People. 26(10). 31–36. 14 indexed citations
10.
Koder, Deborah, et al.. (2010). Training Nurses in Cognitive Assessment: Uses and Misuses of the Mini-Mental State Examination. Educational Gerontology. 36(10-11). 827–833. 1 indexed citations
11.
Koder, Deborah & Edward Helmes. (2008). Predictors of Interest in Working with Older Adults: A Survey of Postgraduate Trainee Psychologists. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education. 29(2). 158–171. 23 indexed citations
12.
Koder, Deborah & Edward Helmes. (2008). Reactions to ageing among Australian psychologists. Australasian Journal on Ageing. 27(4). 212–214. 7 indexed citations
13.
Koder, Deborah & Edward Helmes. (2008). The current status of clinical geropsychology in Australia: A survey of practising psychologists. Australian Psychologist. 43(1). 22–26. 13 indexed citations
14.
Koder, Deborah & Edward Helmes. (2008). Predictors of working with older adults in an Australian psychologist sample: Revisiting the influence of contact.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 39(3). 276–282. 18 indexed citations
15.
Pachana, Nancy A., Edward Helmes, & Deborah Koder. (2006). Guidelines for the provision of psychological services for older adults. Australian Psychologist. 41(1). 15–22. 9 indexed citations
16.
Koder, Deborah & Edward Helmes. (2006). Clinical psychologists in aged care in Australia: A questionof attitude or training?. Australian Psychologist. 41(3). 179–185. 15 indexed citations
17.
Koder, Deborah. (2005). Cognitive Therapy With Older Adults: Are Adaptations Necessary?. Australian Journal of Psychology. 57. 101–276. 2 indexed citations
18.
Koder, Deborah. (1998). Treatment of Anxiety in the Cognitively Impaired Elderly: Can Cognitive-Behavior Therapy Help?. International Psychogeriatrics. 10(2). 173–182. 33 indexed citations
19.
Koder, Deborah & Susan J. Ferguson. (1998). The status of geropsychology in australia: Exploring why Australian psychologists are not working with elderly clients. Australian Psychologist. 33(2). 96–100. 14 indexed citations
20.
Koder, Deborah, Henry Brodaty, & Kaarin J. Anstey. (1996). Cognitive therapy for depression in the elderly. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. 11(2). 97–107. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026