Deborah K. Eakin

411 total citations
20 papers, 275 citations indexed

About

Deborah K. Eakin is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Deborah K. Eakin has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 275 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 8 papers in Social Psychology and 3 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Deborah K. Eakin's work include Memory Processes and Influences (12 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers). Deborah K. Eakin is often cited by papers focused on Memory Processes and Influences (12 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (5 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (3 papers). Deborah K. Eakin collaborates with scholars based in United States. Deborah K. Eakin's co-authors include Christopher Hertzog, Thomas A. Schreiber, Susan D. Sergent-Marshall, Cindy L. Bethel, David C. May, William G. Harris, Alexis Jones, Megan Stubbs-Richardson, Lesley Strawderman and Daniel W. Carruth and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, Accident Analysis & Prevention and Journal of Memory and Language.

In The Last Decade

Deborah K. Eakin

20 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Deborah K. Eakin United States 10 133 128 52 43 40 20 275
Royce Anders France 14 159 1.2× 81 0.6× 76 1.5× 142 3.3× 53 1.3× 32 452
Margreet Vogelzang United Kingdom 7 106 0.8× 97 0.8× 80 1.5× 29 0.7× 18 0.5× 24 263
Marie Izaute France 12 241 1.8× 71 0.6× 90 1.7× 93 2.2× 23 0.6× 27 385
Matthieu Courgeon France 9 97 0.7× 139 1.1× 48 0.9× 76 1.8× 102 2.5× 16 344
Joseph D. Chisholm Canada 8 219 1.6× 47 0.4× 131 2.5× 227 5.3× 48 1.2× 17 416
Céline Clavel France 9 62 0.5× 76 0.6× 25 0.5× 54 1.3× 46 1.1× 40 229
Laura Schmitz Germany 9 203 1.5× 235 1.8× 91 1.8× 100 2.3× 26 0.7× 27 380
Sarah B. Drivdahl United States 7 322 2.4× 196 1.5× 60 1.2× 54 1.3× 32 0.8× 8 415
Massimiliano L. Cappuccio Australia 11 131 1.0× 110 0.9× 21 0.4× 18 0.4× 62 1.6× 34 295
Cedar Riener United States 5 142 1.1× 75 0.6× 120 2.3× 56 1.3× 12 0.3× 11 343

Countries citing papers authored by Deborah K. Eakin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Deborah K. Eakin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deborah K. Eakin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deborah K. Eakin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Deborah K. Eakin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Deborah K. Eakin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Deborah K. Eakin. The network helps show where Deborah K. Eakin may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Deborah K. Eakin

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Deborah K. Eakin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Deborah K. Eakin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Deborah K. Eakin. Deborah K. Eakin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McDonough, Ian M., et al.. (2021). Is there more to metamemory? An argument for two specialized monitoring abilities. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 28(5). 1657–1667. 4 indexed citations
2.
Nagahi, Morteza, et al.. (2020). Determinants of Systems Thinking in College Engineering Students: Research Initiation. Papers on Engineering Education Repository (American Society for Engineering Education). 9 indexed citations
3.
May, David C., et al.. (2018). Strategies to Combat Bullying: Parental Responses to Bullies, Bystanders, and Victims. Youth & Society. 51(3). 358–376. 20 indexed citations
4.
Rahman, Md Mahmudur, Lesley Strawderman, Teena M. Garrison, Deborah K. Eakin, & Carrick C. Williams. (2017). Work zone sign design for increased driver compliance and worker safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention. 106. 67–75. 19 indexed citations
5.
Bethel, Cindy L., et al.. (2017). He can read your mind: Perceptions of a character-guessing robot. 242–247. 6 indexed citations
6.
Bethel, Cindy L., et al.. (2017). Moving toward an intelligent interactive social engagement framework for information gathering. 4. 21–26. 3 indexed citations
7.
Keeley, Jared W., et al.. (2017). An investigation of training, schemas, and false recall of diagnostic features for mental disorders.. Training and Education in Professional Psychology. 11(3). 174–181. 1 indexed citations
8.
Keeley, Jared W., et al.. (2016). Are Clinicians Better Than Lay Judges at Recalling Case Details? An Evaluation of Expert Memory. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 72(4). 384–400. 3 indexed citations
9.
Bethel, Cindy L., et al.. (2016). Using robots to interview children about bullying: Lessons learned from an exploratory study. 712–717. 42 indexed citations
10.
Bethel, Cindy L., et al.. (2013). Eyewitnesses are misled by human but not robot interviewers. Human-Robot Interaction. 25–32. 8 indexed citations
11.
Eakin, Deborah K., Christopher Hertzog, & William G. Harris. (2013). Age invariance in semantic and episodic metamemory: Both younger and older adults provide accurate feeling-of-knowing for names of faces. Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition. 21(1). 27–51. 21 indexed citations
12.
Bethel, Cindy L., et al.. (2013). Eyewitnesses are misled by human but not robot interviewers. 25–32. 15 indexed citations
13.
Eakin, Deborah K. & Christopher Hertzog. (2012). Age Invariance in Feeling of Knowing During Implicit Interference Effects. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 67(5). 555–562. 11 indexed citations
14.
Eakin, Deborah K. & Robert J. Smith. (2012). Retroactive interference effects in implicit memory.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(5). 1419–1424. 5 indexed citations
15.
Eakin, Deborah K. & Christopher Hertzog. (2011). Immediate judgments of learning are insensitive to implicit interference effects at retrieval. Memory & Cognition. 40(1). 8–18. 6 indexed citations
16.
Eakin, Deborah K.. (2010). ListChecker Pro 1.2: A program designed to facilitate creating word lists using the University of South Florida word association norms. Behavior Research Methods. 42(4). 1012–1021. 7 indexed citations
17.
Eakin, Deborah K. & Christopher Hertzog. (2006). Release From Implicit Interference in Memory and Metamemory: Older Adults Know That They Can't Let Go. The Journals of Gerontology Series B. 61(6). P340–P347. 13 indexed citations
18.
Eakin, Deborah K.. (2005). Illusions of knowing: Metamemory and memory under conditions of retroactive interference. Journal of Memory and Language. 52(4). 526–534. 22 indexed citations
19.
Eakin, Deborah K., Thomas A. Schreiber, & Susan D. Sergent-Marshall. (2003). Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: The presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 29(5). 813–825. 58 indexed citations
20.
Wade, Travis, Deborah K. Eakin, Arvin Agah, et al.. (2002). Modeling recognition of speech sounds with minerva2. 1653–1656. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026